Administration more generally to make public attribution, to call rush out and what its doing in terms of hacking. I think the russians see any failure to push back as an open door. Even since that conversation we agency,he world doping secretary powells private emails. We are going to see more and more of this if theres not a strong push back. Gin by naming and shaming. Russia is probably the worst culprit. Its time they were called out. Deb is there a problem with , areng it was the russians we just not there yet in terms of it . Congressman schiff i think there is ample evidence to call out the russians. I dont think its for a lack of evidence. Are a number of considerations the administration has to wait to prepare to go beyond naming and shaming, one of the repercussions they would consider . I think you have to take a graduated approach. If the conduct escalates, the response can escalate and it can escalate in the form of economic sanctions or going after the individuals who are
When wednesday if she was asked if they would be responding to the russian hacking, stay tuned. What do you think she meant by that . Congressman schiff they have not made a Firm Decision on what the course of action will be. I have been asking the administration more generally to make public attribution, to call rush out and what its doing in terms of hacking. I think the russians see any failure to push back as an open door. Even since that conversation we had of the world doping agency, secretary powells private emails. We are going to see more and more of this if theres not a strong push back. That has to begin by naming and shaming. Russia is probably the worst culprit. Its time they were called out. Deb is there a problem with knowing it was the russians, are we just not there yet in terms of it . Congressman schiff i think there is ample evidence to call out the russians. I dont think its for a lack of evidence. There are a number of considerations the administration has to wait
Face Similar Health and safety risk every day at schools like this. Thus perpetuating lower Graduation Rates and difficulties retaining qualified teachers. In fact, chairman kline and i applaud him for it himself called for action on Tribal School construction in a letter to the bureau of Indian Education just last week, and again mr. Chairman, i applaud you for that. Regarding the school, the chairman said, and i quote, this appalling situation not only adversely affects the quality of education these students receive but also their health and their safety. The chairman is right. Our children deserve better regardless of where they live. I want to particularly thank congresswoman Betty Mccollum for her continued support on this issue, as well as congressman Ann Kirkpatrick of arizona, congressman Ben Ray Lujan of arizona, and congressman ruiz of california for cosponsoring this amendment. Im pleased the Administration Requests more money for the bureau of Indian Education, Constructio
What to look for to bring somebody forward for a possibility of a court review for em. This is not Carte Blanche like i said, for the Sheriffs Department to let everybody out. This is the exception to the rule so those people who have proven in custody over the period of supervision time that they dont have behavior problems, their history, violence history is not something that would preclude them from em. Understand that all em criteria which indicates who can and cannot get on em is very strict. Thats not going to change. Thats still going to be held in place. Whats going to be added to those restrictions is if a person in the legislation has a certain low level offense, theyve proven themselves in custody, that might be something the court will want to look at to reevaluate their decision on bail or em the power is still with the judge. My understanding of the system, and this is from some of the my time working in the Law Enforcement system. When you have low level non violent off
Briefing over however period of time so you understand what the contrast is. Theres no way shape or form that i as sheriff and that this department would want to do anything to forward any risk or compromise to Public Safety, but the notion that i heard being put out there, whether this is true in the perception or not of some, that we would unilaterally put what we are proposing is the same way that theres a response mechanism by the da and court who often asks us could we put a sex offender or somebody for child important electronic monitoring, we have the right to say no and we often do. But what weve noticed though, by the way weve said no to people being put on em, its happening anyway, a Cottage Industry has erupted that is not supervised by the Sheriffs Department and by state statute, all em for sentence population supervised by the Sheriffs Department. To allow somebody to be be put on,m even after weve rejected it, and were trying to reign that practice in. If this detail is,