Have no closed session today. There is a opportunity to comment on each discussion or actionetum on the agenda. Each comment is limited to two minutes. Public comment will be taking both in person and remotely by callin. For each item, the board will take Public Comment from those attending the meeting in person and then those remotely. Comments are opportunities to speak during the Public Comment period are available via phone by calling 4156550001 access code, 26620891628 and and again. When connected you will hear the meeting discussion but be muted and listening mode only. When your item of interest comes up, press star 3 to be added to the speaker line. Best practice are call from a quite location, speak clearly and slowly and turn down your tv or radio. Please note the city policies along with federal state and local law prohibit discriminatory or harassing conduct against City Employees and others during Public Meetings and will not be tolerated. Moreover, Public Comment is perm
Proceedings here in the chamber , the board of supervisors and its committees are convening hybrid meetings that allow inperson attendance and Public Comment while still providing Remote Access and Public Comment via telephone. Public comment will be taken on each item on this agenda. Those attending in person will be allowed to speak first, and then well take those who are waiting on the telephone line for those watching remotely and streaming through. Sfcv. Tv. Org. The Public Comment callin number is streaming across the screen and when connected you will hear the meeting discussions, but youll be muted and in listening mode only when your item of interest comes up in public. Comment is called. Those joining us in person should line up to speak and those on telephone should dial star three to be added to the speaker line. If youre on your telephone, please remember to turn down your tv and all listening devices may be using and each speaker will be allowed up to two minutes to speak
Greer, oic of the general work detail. Id like to recognize officer Michael Grande for his dedication and professionalism of the general work detail. Officer grande has over 18 years of service with the San Francisco Police Department since the general work detail was reestablished in march of 2022. Officer grande has been the sole video retrieval officer for and worked hundreds of complex cases as Video Evidence has become increasingly critical for successful prosecution of cases and is frequently the only evidence to identify perpetrators of crimes. This evidence is fleeting and is often retained for as little as one week due to data storage constraints of many systems. Office ser grande has routinely made himself available at hours beyond his normal schedule to obtain his evidence in a timely manner. The officer grande is one of only five members of the sfpd to have completed an intensive week long course on forensic video retrieval and analysis through viva. In addition to the Tech
Them with a scope of work that was approved by the variance because if you approved it for a larger scope of work that would not make sense because the variance would have been approved already for that limited scope of work. So essentially if the variance is upheld tonight a maximum extent is locked in. And if the variance is denied tonight, then well see them in another year when they come back they would have an option so the city charter allows, basically if you have a project disapproved, you can, one year later, basically apply for essentially the same project. Or change the project, yeah. Yeah, and right now, youd have to change it in a way that would be significantly different from the original project. You cant tweak the project and say its a different project. It has to be a significantly different project. Yeah. Thank you. Thank you. Commissioners the matters submitted. Variance commentator. Because i always comment . Exactly. You have the greatest wisdom. You know as i was
Regulating, getting fees, actually having somebody in charge of regulating the industry on january 1, seemed like a good idea. But im not wedded. There is no deal for me. I mean, i was just hoping to get something set up so we could show that we fulfilled the promise of 64. But, you know, if we continue, will we get there . We have legislation in front of us. It is the land use issues that have stuck, that weve gotten stuck on. So why dont we just work on that today . I sat through, you know, i dont know how many hours of both rules and planning. And the rules piece seems like there are changes, but in general, its been pretty people seem fairly comfortable with it. But we wont be able to get to equity if we dont get through this planning piece. I agree with supervisor safai, is there some way we can make sure the pipeline is filled with equity participants . I have no i think we heard talk the first 30, two years, we only take equity applicants. Or three years. I think there is a seve