It has become standard. I agree with you. That was the intent of the 90s act. Use a different model. That is what this proposed rule is going to do as well. Use it in a way that accomplishes the goal that will be very flexible. Let me ask you this question. The constitutionality of the epa setting standards has been published before. He upheld approaching the the 19 night independent in whitman versus American Trucking in 2001. In 2011 the Supreme Court ruled the epa has the authority to set standards for Carbon Pollution under section 111 d. And eight connecting opinion versus connecticut. We believe the epa can consider as it is undertaking to do with regulating existing nonauthorized versus under section 111 of the Clean Air Act. Is there any constitutional question about epas approach or the Legal Authority to regulate Carbon Pollution under section 111 of the Clean Air Act . No, i dont think so. The constitutional issues have been a distraction. Theyve been used to make people wor
House. Please help those who labor here to recognize how you are present in their service and leadership. Guide them as they seek to be effective for the good of all your people. Loving god, may our leaders be alert to the cares and hurts and challenges of our citizens and our communities. Help these leaders choose well, directions and actions that benefit those likely to be left out and all who express and strengthen our nations values which are our greatest assets. May we hear and pursue your sacred message, merciful god, that we be women and men with the capacity of peacemakers, realistic and also deeply thoughtful and wise. Finally, gentle god, bring to those who serve here a participation in your own gifts, such as rich insight and also joy in their care for the wellbeing of our country and the world. Amen. The speaker the chair has examined the journal of the last days proceedings and announces to the house his approval thereof. Pursuant to clause 1 of rule 1 the journal stands a
Chair Martin Dempsey whether i have a concern or whether it is true, the government of iran is responsible for their behavior so we are concerned about their behavior. There is about six things that concern me about irans behavior. One of which is the nuclear issue. Im certainly supportive of the effort to try to resolve that the politically. We will have other issues with iran. Resolve that diplomatically. On occasion, there are efforts to threaten freedom and navigation. We have to work these. The government of iran has to if they are going to act responsibly and engage the world as they claim they wish to do, they have to control the irg see land forces irgc land forces. Going back to the syria training program, when exactly did it start . Can you tell us more about who the trainees are . Are they from the fsa . The second question is regarding Drone Operations. There have been some measures in congress to speed up this transfer of Drone Operations to the military. Can you give us a
That it is not random. I remember in my earlier time thinking, well, if you have one woman already in one of those top three positions, then no one is going to want to elect the second one because they will think theyre overdoing it, you know . People in the state have gotten used to electing a woman. It could be that there is a role modeling that is going on and more women are really thinking about becoming political. The women themselves, and some of the women in those positions have said, no, actually, i showed the next woman where the pockets of energy or the pockets of money were. It is like bringing the next one along. It is so exciting, because we have to find ways to really expand these numbers. We cannot just keep moving along. It takes 200 years at the rate we are going. I am not kidding. Literally. You have to find ways to say, we already have one woman in this state come hell or high water. We are going to run a woman for governor and a woman for senator in that very state.
When the process starts and perhaps it would be helpful if ms. Will from the rent board explains the process theres two nos that are fidelity but the perch starts with the first notice thats good to how far. Indian is the legislation wouldnt apply to buyist because the preference kicks in with the landlord files a notice of intent to wraut withdraw from the market and thats the official ellis pressure and they file a notice with the tenancies of the office. But with the bow out the landlord approaches the tenant and offers money and they wont have to file with our office and the tenant takes the money and runs. And this legislation didnt apply to those paents tenants its difficult for us to track those. It so you would their private agreement and if those people are included your double dipping because youve been cut a you sum of money and youd be eligible for the relocation for the housing those are not as high for the market but theyre separate agreements fairly entered into. And my