Didnt hear from the District Attorney yesterday. Keep in mind, you cant indict a ham sandwich but the high bar will be 12 people on a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. A lot of developments. But first, i want is all to step back as a country. We need to step back and take a collective deep breath and understand this moment and realize this country is at a tipping point. Is dangerous. We are at a point where we will either go the way of law and order, peace, prosperity, one American Family in the way of safety on the way of security, or we will go down the road of liberal lawlessness and total anarchy. Because the sweeping broad and in many cases false generalizations of groups of people, and lets be honest, outright lies at times that we are seeing officers against those that stand in the way of chaos and even the safety of your family, this nonstop rush to judgment is intensifying all around the country especially in big cities by the hour. This madness to defund, dismantle, destroy Pol
Keep in mind, you cant indict a ham sandwich but the high bar will be 12 people on a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. A lot of developments. But first, i want is all to step back as a country. We need to step back and take a collective deep breath and understand this moment and realize this country is at a tipping point. Is dangerous. We are at a point where we will either go the way of law and order, peace, prosperity, one American Family in the way of safety on the way of security, or we will go down the road of liberal lawlessness and total anarchy. Because the sweeping broad and in many cases false generalizations of groups of people, and lets be honest, outright lies at times that we are seeing officers against those that stand in the way of chaos and even the safety of your family, this nonstop rush to judgment is intensifying all around the country especially in big cities by the hour. This madness to defund, dismantle, destroy Police Departments is now a clear and present danger
So, as long as we can address some of the issues that some of the commissioners have brought up, i do want to support that i am supportive of looking at other options. I do would like to echo the comments of commissioner tang. I am interested on the options on Mission Street. Now, i dont see anyone else in the cue, maybe we can continue with the presentation . So, i am just going to talk a little bit about the projects and some of the reasons why we are doing these particular options. As we have discussed before, the better Market Street project is trying to address many things in the corridor and we need improvements for all modes of transportation, pedestrian improvements bicycle improvements transit improvements and better or reducing auto conflicts, and other vehicle improvements. So to this end, as you have alluded, we have come up with three options, that we are moving forward and studying in great detail. So for all three of the options there are basic consistent points, one of
Item number 1 is an ordinance approving exceptions to requirements of the seismic safety loan program under the administrative code and the sslp program regulations, regarding a 2,379,464 loan for an existing Affordable Housing project at the hotel isabel located at 1091 mission street. Thank you. And supervisor kim is the author of this legislation. Thank you, chair wiener. This is basically we are asking for an exception to our seismic safety loan Program Deferred extended loan program. Hotelies isabel is one of our Affordable Housing units here in district 6 on the south of market. Currently has 72 units Affordable Housing and its owned by the hotel [speaker not understood] a limited partnership with who is general partner is todd koh who is here today and were just ready to ask for an exemption from the loan to value ratio requirement and other underwriting criteria set forth in the San Francisco administrative code for a number of reasons that i believe the Mayors Office of housin
Rva because the construction documents are due may 31st and the longer we put that off the more expensive this project becomes and it defeats everything that director metcalf is looking to do which is save money. The seconds thing that we are going to come back to you on march 25th. Was a recommendation on what to do further with skanka, do we ask the board to allow us to negotiate further . Reject the bid . And they will have a recommendation for you then, we are not coming to the board on march 25th, with the recommendation to adopt the reserves and contingencies we can at this point because we need to give web corps times to relook at the whole structural steel, do we repackage everything . Do we redesign the steel in some way to be able to give the response that you asked for. So march 25th, would be allowing us to move so that the design team could finish and that would just include the direction on the rva and the direction of what to move forward and that is it for march 25th an