Oh, thank you get a vote to approve minutes. All in favor, say i. I. Opposed . The minutes Carry Forward next item is general Public Comment now the opportunity for Public Comment on matters not on the agenda today. Good afternoon. Eddy with bright line dws here to speak on two items not before in commission first, the strongest loophole hiring this is released by the office of office of Economic Workforce Development youre aware the local hiring by this the president has been very strong compared to other 5 contracting departments overall the city exceeded its mandated goal of thirty percent and most projects in the city on average up to 45 percent thats phenomenal so much youve seen press in the last week we pleaseer and no where is 12 apparent in the San Francisco board of education as you see in the handful ive provide originally the public works commitment was 35 percent year to year 35 percent 25 but under the thirty it jumped to 47 percent beyond the average target thank you to
September 15, 2016, city of San Francisco Government Audit Oversight Committee [ gavel ] good morning and welcome to the government audit and Oversight Committee. Im the chair of the committee, supervisor aaron peskin joined by supervisor norman yee and Committee Member and board president. Supervisor london breed our clerk is erica major. Are there any announcements . City clerk yes, please silence your cell phones and providing documents should be to the clerk. This is the board of supervisors agenda for september 27, 2016. Supervisor aaron peskin great. Please read items 1 and 2. Clerk [hearing civil grand jury maintenance budgeting and accounting challenges for general Fund Departments maintenance economics versus maintenance politics pay now or pay more later] sf 11234 2. 160614 [board response civil grand jury maintenance budgeting and accounting challenges for general Fund Departments maintenance economics versus maintenance politics pay now sf 21234 supervisor aaron peskin than
Supervisors agenda for september 27, 2016. Supervisor aaron peskin great. Please read items 1 and 2. Clerk [hearing civil grand jury maintenance budgeting and accounting challenges for general Fund Departments maintenance economics versus maintenance politics pay now or pay more later] sf 11234 2. 160614 [board response civil grand jury maintenance budgeting and accounting challenges for general Fund Departments maintenance economics versus maintenance politics pay now sf 21234 supervisor aaron peskin thank you. These items are reports to the civil grand jury. The first item is a hearing civil grand jury maintenance budgeting accounting challenges for general Fund Departments maintenance economics versus maintenance politics. Please come forward. My name is James Cunningham with the civil grand jury. Thank you, mr. Hopkins, good morning. Good morning. That was quite a deep dive. Thank you for acknowledging that. It was fun to prepare. In fact that report has 19 sets of fingerprints all
A concerted effort with cops and go funds and contributing as well to the sales tax increase to the San Francisco street resurfacing and committed to pavement conditions at 70 and we are on the way to hitting that in the next 2 years or so. We have a Capital Improvement for critical enhancement. We end up with the Capital Budget with the emergencies we had to fund, most notely with the landslides on telegraph hill. Its hard to plan for a landslide. So those are the types of things where we have to have Funds Available and we set aside 10 million a year to do that. And the variable allocation go to infrastructure renewels and facility renewels. I should mention there is talk about Critical Development go funds and now they are being paid through a revolving Capital Planning fund. That was actually a suggestion in the spur report years ago where we were not able to fund it until recently. Again, constantly the Capital Planning committee and various folks at looking at ways to keep this p
Goldstein the boards executive director. Were also joined by representatives from the city departments that of cases before the board this evening good with San Francisco Public Works Bureau of streets and mapping. We are also at the table is senior building inspector representing the department of building inspection and building and this writer Scott Sanchez also are present in the Planning Department and Planning Commission. The board was to turn off or silence all phones or other Electronic Devices so will not disturb the proceedings. The board schools of presentation are as follows. Appellants and Department Respondents are each given 7 min. To present their case and 3 min. For rebuttal. People affiliated with these parties must conclude that comets within the seven or 3 min. Period. Member of the public not affiliate with the parties up to 3 min. Each to address the board and no rebuttal. Please speak into the end of the microphone. To assist the board in the accurate operation o