Are entering the most risky phases of development. There are still technical hurdles to overcome. Particularly with the orion spacecraft which is addressing challenges with the parachute system and heat shield among others. There is also considerable development and testing ahead for orion in terms of the human support systems. Meanwhile, sos is continuing to pursue the earlier launch dates of december 2017. While nasas urgency is understandable, the schedule for achieving the earlier date mostly with respect to the core stage is very aggressive. Theres little room to address problems. Moreover, it does not appear that orion and the ground system can achieve the earlier date. And the longterm we have concerns about the cost estimating for human Space Exploration programs. Nasas only produce estimates for sos and ground system through the first flight test and orion through the second flight test. There is still Significant Development ahead for sos after the first flight and significan
Negotiations and fracture the coalition, the Effective Coalition that we have. cn÷ i do believe that if the administration thinks that they can conclude an agreement and move on without congress weighing in, however at some point on that agreement thats a bridge too far. It is our right and responsibility to weigh in and i will be anxious to see the administrations formal response to the chairmans proposal and look forward to those discussions as well. Also as a Side Agreement im glad to see the treasury has lessened its load a bit by changing our policy toward cuba and that we arent spending so much time and resources licensing americans to travel to cuba and can free up resources and time and effort to make sure these agreements and the sanctions we currently have and future sanctions if they should be ramped up, that we have the resources to actually do that. I would just say that i would applaud the chairman for putting forth the proposal he has in terms of congress weighing in on
Chapman, lor lorenzo goco, trecd genif, michael neblet, michael pezner, Caroline Tess and james wolf. And finally david granite, who has been a neverfaltering staff director throughout this review. Madam president , this study is bigger than the actions of the c. I. A. Its really about American Values and more or less. Its about the constitution, the bill of rights, our rule of law. These values exist regardless of the circumstances in which we find ourselves. They exist in peacetime and in wartime, and if we cast aside these values when convenient, we have failed to live by the very preseptembers that precepts that make our nation a great jaun. There is a r twhee carry the banner after great nation. So we submit this stud on behalf of the committee to the public in the belief that it will stand the test of time and with it the report will carry the message never again. I very much appreciate your attention and i yield to senator mccain. You can see the report. Up next, well would hear
Knowing whether they have been limited on what actions might or may not be available. The president has made it clear it is not his policy. I have never seen anybody more adamant about that and more clear in every statement he has made. They were all quoted. He has reiterated it. But that doesnt mean that you want to take away what might be conceivably necessary the president is absolutely clear about his policy. President s the decision to use force and thank you to this committee for voting and having made clear that congress was moving in that direction guess what . Instead of one or two days of bombing, in order to send a message that you shouldnt use these, we got a deal with russia to get 100 of the weapons out. That is because you didnt limited. Didnt limit it. That was another moment where for the first time in history during a conflict we removed all known declared chemical weapons from a country, and believe me thank god we did. Today, isolate is in their controlling half the
Also, join the conversation on cspan wj is our handle. You can also send us emails. We will get to your thoughts in just one minute. Joining us is candidate delaney. He is here to take your questions about this intelligent report. When you begin with what Dianne Feinstein had to say. She talks about the findings of this report. We have 20 findings and conclusions which fall into four general categories. First, the cias and enhanced interrogation techniques were not an effective way to get a better intelligence information. Second, the cia provided extensive amounts of inaccurate information about the program a end its effectiveness to the white house, the department of justice, congress, the cia inspector general, and the American Public. Third, the cias management of the program was in adequate and deeply flawed. Fourth, the cia program was far more neutral billion people were led to believe. What did we learn from this report . About theknown a lot basics of what was done to al qaeda