Will become a reality the majority of San Francisco doesnt have one provider they can use and we have another provider that has to go through the same rated process that provides the rate power and the Transbay Center and the tjpa recently decided to go with the puc has its power provider weve heard concerns about reliability and the puc is a reliable power provider to our airport or the General Hospital for years the power has gone out there so colleagues, i ask for your support of this important legislation which will move us in a positive direction in terms of Climate Change and as well as addressing those are power needs in our system. Thank you, supervisor wiener. Supervisor tang thank you, supervisor wiener . An interesting proposal as you mentioned on many entities dont have a choice to some of the questions come up from the private entities that may fall under this i guess this set up here i think that folks have raised concerns about not having the choice so i wonder in the th
Service including local control and lower rates and promotion of renewable and clean energy and Greater Transparency and accountability expanding the point of interest Enterprises Retail Customer Base instead of selling it well provide much needed revenue for the pucs system and our street light system thats a huge deferred infrastructure needs and the retail power is sold at three to four times as wholesale puc estimates 10 meg wauts was the it residence the net revenue so if the puc were able to increase the retail sales of electricity by one hundred megawatts that will generate 40 million in new revenue that could be reinvested in the system including our street light system pucs power enterprise facilities currently have massive deferred maintenance in the hundreds of dollars of thousand of maintenance in hetch hetchy and locally in our street light system weve seen the result off our deteriorated street light system where is the puc didnt have the revenues to modernize the system
Amount of the contract by t not to exceed 4,409,489, for Environmental Analysis Services for the geary brt project Environmental Impact report statement, and authorizing the executive Rapid Transit brt project Environmental Review phase, in an amount not to exceed 139,276, and to negotiate agreement Payment Terms and nonmaterial Agreement Terms an conditions; and assigning the professional Services Contract with Jacobs Engineering group t circlepoint, increasing the amount of the contract by 225,000, to a total amount not to exceed 4,409,489, for Environmental Analysis Services for the geary brt project Environmental Impact report statement, director to modify nonmaterial contract terms and conditions tatement eir s that is being submitted for local and federal Agency Review before circulating to the public. In response to Transportation Authority board and other input seeking faster delivery of benefits to the corridor, sfmta staff is conducting conceptual planning for a potential ini
Architects ill say at this point, im not adverse interests not an analysis or data to understand how seriously problems there are although weve heard anecdotal evidence of issues weve decided to ask the city administered to convene a working group to Work Together a gadget data specifically to look at the situation is of architects versus engineers and at the end of that time period the Zoning Administrator low provide an analysis and make recommendations open whether there should be additional categories for example, to cart out architect and set that aside as a specific category in indicating committee no one said theyre interested but if youre interested im sure that our Zoning Administrator naomi kelly will be taking recommendations that come out a month from now to potentially turn that into chapter 14. Ill foul. Thank you, colleagues take this item same house, same call . Passed on 7 first reading. Madam clerk. Item 46 was recommended a resolution to approve a contract between th
Just heard from mark, and also to allow us to respond in between um, the hearings if there is an urgent need to approve opposition or testify at hearings. This is increasing the revenue. This is not just in general for transportation, but looking at ways to make it easier for local jurisdictions to help them out. This is includes a better threshold for transportation measures. It is also advocates for ways to distribute the setting in San Francisco, so in particular we will be watching the cap and trade discussions as they move forward next year and the active Transportation Program discussions. And another thing to support San Francisco priority projects. This is advancing highspeed rail, including the cal train and the city vision zero effort. So many bills last year, as mark referenced that were aimed at dealing with motorcyclists and infarctions against bikers and pedestrians. We will be following those and any other transportation. And we will be supporting mtas effort as we indic