Immigration reform and you heard them explaining how republicans are urging comprehensive Immigration Reform. Before i go to the next speaker, madam speaker, how much time do we still have . The speaker pro tempore you have 18 minutes. Ardard with that, i mr. Cardenas with that, i yield time to mr. Garcia of florida. Id like to thank the gentleman from california. Madam speaker, its been 20 days since the Senate Passed overwhelmingly bipartisan Immigration Reform bill. In the House Judiciary Committee, we have been considering we have considered four controversial bills, none of which address the 11 Million People that are already here. In south florida, for example, there are thousands of ven wail d families stuck in an immigration system with illegal or undocumented status. They have fleed and purchased homes and invested millions in our committee. Earlier this year, i introduced a bill, which would allow any. Esident of venezuela this is similar to what Congress Passed in 1997 with
Storage. I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting this amendment. Lets listen to the men and women and support their success to the fullest extent possible. Thank you, mr. Chairman. The chair for what purpose does the gentleman rise . Mr. Frelinghuysen i rise to claim time in opposition. The chair the gentleman is recognized. Mr. Frelinghuysen the army has made it clear to the committee that it doesnt want to retain the c23s, the she prmbings as, the work horses that have been doing work for over 30 years or require any replacement platform. The army has taken steps to put the aircraft out of operation while stopping short of full retirement. Year beginning of fiscal 2013, the Army National guard was operating 34 of these sherpas. As of july 14 of those had been turned into fort sill turned in to fort sill, oklahoma where they were in semiflyable storage. The remaining aircraft are to be turned in to fort sill by october of this year. Because this amendment only applies to fiscal
And giving you a chance to sound off about it this early in the morning. You can do so by giving us a call at 186655press. We invite your comments as always on twitter at bpshow and on facebook at facebook. Com billpressshow. President obama bringing the focus back on the economy yesterday. Weve got to the stakes, he said for the middle class could not be higher than they are today. He told crowds yesterday in illinois and missouri. Today he takes the same message down to jacksonville, florida challenging republicans in congress to stop bhoking everything and get to work, helping create jobs in this country. Meanwhile, the pope continues to wow them down in brazil. Yes, Anthony Weiner vows he is going to stay in the race up in new york city but more and more people including the mighty New York Times are telling him hes got to get out and take care of his personal problems. Well talk about that and a whole lot more here on current tv. vo current tv gets the conversation started weekday
Challenge to the new Source Performance Standards since the passage of the 1977 amendments. Therefore, the court was rprised that Neither Party raised during the discussion below the appropriate standard of law in that discussion. They did not even mention the fact of a new major legislative effort. So even with the best kind of counsel it can happen. Issues spotting is a challenging business. Yes. Even with counsel and without it reliance on a judge is often hazardous. Ive never been a judge but ive litigated for a number of years and ive always been astonished at how cases that ive tried may raise issues on appeal that i thought were nsignificant and sometimes decided by a ruling without an opinion but i think that the reason i propose a constitutional advocate be involved in every decision that she or he thought was significant was to give the court the benefit of that kind of additional insight and guidance and perspective. Im going to turn to my colleague, senator grassley, and th
At stake for republicans voting in favor of it. The bill is essentially a clean suspension of the debt ceiling for about 13 months. What they are basically voting is if you are someone who in a republican primary contest, there are already arguments being made that republicans essentially voted in favor of giving a blank check for more government borrowing for a little more than the next year. It is the kind of thing that wont play well in republican primaries. Something thes republicans generally didnt want to have to vote for. They ultimately voted against it on the final passage. Observers of the senate know very well that this is not the where the final vote is the one that is really important. The vote that matters is the one with the 60 vote threshold. Which was, in this case,emanded by senator ted cruz the relative newcomer from texas that really wanted that threshold. Among the pieces you are writing, the worlds greatest blog, back toody that vote, you said the Democratic Leade