Conduct requirement came out of the experience that pg e and marin energy had when marin energy launched its program so the code of conduct puts certain restrictions on both parties, the utility, in our case pg e and on us as a cca. Broadly speaking it prohibits either party from misleading customers. It requires that any expenditures that pg e incurs to actively market against the program cannot be reimbursed by rate payers and shared by shareholders. It allows pg e to answer questions and educate about their program and how it compares to our program. It requires both parties to work with the California Public Utilities Commission Public Advisors office to create a comparison document that would be made able by all parties on the two Program Offerings. So that gives you some of the key elements. And the code of conduct you said is in the process of being approved or is approved. So a proposed decision was drafted and sent out for comment by the cupuc staff. It then by state statute s
Lot. I think as we continue doing those kind of cases and building those cases we will see results. We have asset forfeitures that will be coming so i can foresee more things happening. Were currently working with the fbi right now. Commissioner turman. I move that we, the ask the board of supervisors to authorize the police to retroactively accept and appropriate a grant in the amount of 200,000 from the california Emergency Management agency. Second. First we have to have Public Comment. Any Public Comment . Seeing none, all in favor say aye. Please call line item 5. Line item 5, Public Comment on all matters pertaining to item 7 below, closed session, including Public Comment on vote whether to hold item 7 in closed session. Motion with reference to the closed session matters, ladies and gentlemen these are disciplinary matters involving police officers. They are protected by the california constitution and the California Supreme Court decision of kochley may i have a motion . Were
Program when it was initially proposed by pg e would have pg e offering to san franciscans an opportunity for 100 renewable product that is greening up their portfolio to using Renewable Energy credits, so they have placed a proposal before the california puc for their agreement. Parties are engaged in asking questions, testimony has been filed. The cupuc had scheduled hearings in december for the proposal, but those hearings on hold in order to allow parties to talk further and potentially arrive at a settlement. There really isnt active settlement discussion under way right now. We expect that may happen in january, and if you play out that process we think that maybe july or august of 2013 we will know what shape the program that pg e has proposed has been authorized by the cupuc. Pg e would then as i understand it from their filings need to go through a solicitation process to hire a Third Party Contractor to perform the Program Implementation and were thinking it would probably be
With us your announcements. Please make sure to silence all electronic devices. Speaker cards and any documents should be submitted to the clerk. Okay. Do you want to call the roll . You call the roll on puc. Yes. President torres. Here. Commissioner. Here. Commissioner moran commissioner caen and cortni are both excused from todays meeting. Okay. That serves as items one and two. Lets call our hird item. Third item opening remarks and expectations for the joint meeting. Okay. Actually lets just call lets just call items four and five along with that and we can have our opening remarks that will cover all these items. Item four is general update on the cleanpower sf. Item five is discussion on the San Francisco Public Utilities commission and for the education plans for the choice aggregation and cleanpower sf program. Okay. Very good. Colleagues its a really as president torres as said its a momentous occasion, historic occasion we had. We improved our relationship with shell and the
Commissioners that preceded me and the staff and the now general manager as well for their contributions during that process. Thank you mr. Chairman. Thank you. Today we will be discussing the customer notification and the education plan. I think its the bulk of the work before us to look at that plan and see if it meets the needs moving forward. Who is presenting on that from the puc . We will provide the general update of the cleanpower sf program. Barbara hale will give an update. Thank you mr. Herring mr. Kelly, sorry. Thank you, i am barbara hale, assistant general manager for power. By way of updates item four i just wanted to remind you in your packets is a detailed timeline for implementation of our cca program. We also are in working constructively with lafco in their advisory role to the board in implementation our cca program we are operating under a memorandum of understanding with lafco that describes the roles and responsibilities of our respective staff and we expect tha