Order to even get care, and that care was segregated from the rest of healthcare. Youve heard many times about the other problems that are associated. Well, theyre literally paid for separately with a workforce thats trained differently. Now, as healthcare reform and parity roll out, people at all parts of that continuum ought to be able to get care from being screened early, as candace says, through interventions in the office of their primary care doctors to Specialty Care that they already have and beyond. I think its going to be really quite an important benefit for people that are affected, but for the rest of medicine as well, going to see better quality care and farreduced costs. And youve brought in a very good dimension in terms of how we train individuals. Obviously, if were looking for more people to adopt evidencebased practices, right, dr. Laudet . Wouldnt we really Pay Attention to how were training the new people so that to make sure that they really have all the tools t
Most often is my building is just fine in the loma prieta earthquake so everything is fine. Is that true . Loma prieta was different. The ground acceleration here was quite moderate and the duration was moderate. So anyone that believes they survived a big earthquake and their building has been tested is sadly mistaken. We are planning for the bigger earthquake closer to San Francisco and a fault totally independent. Much stronger than the loma prieta earthquake. So people who were here in 89 they should say 3 times as strong and twice as long and that will give them more of an occasion of the earthquake we would have. 10 percent isnt really the threshold of damage. When you triple it you cross that line. Its much more damage in earthquake. I want to thank you, harvey, thanks pat for evening everyone, welcome to the San Francisco commission on the environment. Today is tuesday 24th and it is 5 08 p. M. And we ask you that you turn off your cell phones and the first item on the agenda i
Appropriate. Again i dont have any strong feelings. I just wanted to understand that. The other thing you have no bonuses for making open space publicly accessible and i wanted to understand the rational behind that and that might discourage developers from creating open spaces that are publicly accessible. Sure. This is a common situation where you have competing goals. In western soma there is not a lot of open space and in eastern neighborhoods are you provided to require 80 square feet whether private decks or common courtyards but publicly soabl its 54 and provide half so you could provide less open space in exchange for making it publicly accessible. In this situation it was determined publicly accessible is good if that is enough of an incentive they dont want 50 of the open space reduced by a third. They want to generate as much open space as possible and that is obviously an issue in western soma. Again if we could figure out a way to make it you reach both goals so maybe not
Responsible currently would daylight all of the issues regarding the funding and the impediments to it spreading in the same way that they did sort of a crowd sourced map for the preferences regarding the distribution of the bikes. And there is a lot of talent out there and there is also a lot of money out there and a lot of brain power to figure this out is moung the people as well. And i am an advocate for the port corridor and so i would like to note that the corridor transit is the most density populated and relatively flat and new to the recycling connector between the destinations and in terms of equity, it aced the transit for many of the workers going both north and south and the workers go north, really being the back bone of the economy, and of the entire corridor and then, west and east along the water. And going south, of course, for the people that live in the region who are going down to other further challenges of the cal trans, and so whatever that or the offices downto
Learned about how they placed it in areas that lacked connectiveness to the Transportation System and they could see that there would be significant use immediately as opposed to other areas where they will have to do more education and i see the richmond as one of those areas that is hard to get out to and along the core and i would like to see the analysis that looks at how we can plan for the future for the west side of city as well and one of the key questions that chair avalos mentioned too, is finding a sponsor or sponsors like other metropolitan and the cities or we are an area that is not just one city but a number of cities and we even have more challenges that the bay area and the management district which i sit on with chair avalos, and the challenges of managing a system where they have the 50 percent of the sites but there are cities with many other sites and we have to look at the interests of the other cities as well. Thank you. Commissioner weiner. Thank you. And i woul