[ gavel ] yes, we are back from closed session. There is no report required. The next item, please. The next order of business item 11, adjournment. Madam chair. I dont think we need a motion. Okay, we are adjourned at about 4 10. 4 12. Yes, thank you. [ meeting is adjourned ] do you like this top . Thats so gay. Really . Yeah. Its totally gay. You know, you really shouldnt say that. Say what . Well, say that something is gay when you mean its bad. Its insulting. What if every time something was bad, everybody said, ugh. Thats so girl wearing a skirt as a top. Oh. You are. Ha ha. Shut up. Those are cute jeans, though. Doing a special series about staying safe. Lets look at issues of water and sewer. We are here at the San Francisco urban center on Mission Street in San Francisco and im joined today by marrielen from puc and talk about water and sewer issues. What are things we should be concerned about water. You want to be prepared for that scenario and the recommendation is to have s
Since i have been there there has never been a discussion about treasure island. There are some great buildings there. Along the lines, this project, i know this commission was interested in getting a review on this project. There is a category 1, 11 building on preservation. It maybe worth looking the entire project and its influence on that building early in the process rather than later. Commissioner highland . I was just wondering if any of the projects or the buildings are at risk and if they are, is there any benefit in prioritizing them. They still have ceqa protection. Especially in this midcentury modern projects throughout the city, actually. That might be a way to, i dont know how long it would take if we identify the projects that exist that we can protect it further . The only one that comes to mind aside from perhaps buildings at risk for development within the Pacific Heights neighborhood as commissioner wolfram mentioned is the mothers building because its in such disre
That. Resources will be meeting having an event this friday i am wondering if our Student Advisory Council is also involved in that this friday . I do not think so. Thank you very much. Yes. Did someone else have another comment to add . Announcements. Go ahead. I just wanted to do a couple of congrats. The 19th annual fundraiser last night. It was a great event and commissioner haney and incoming commissioner walton were both there and i was really glad to see them. Its just an Amazing Group of young people that performed last night. And then on saturday, an Organization Called pac to stem did a great event at the ywca in bay view that had young people from stanford and berkeley come and present to our young people on Stem Education and some of the stem careers that they can go into. It was really powerful to see these young men and women of color speaking to your young people as rolemodels and i really wanted to appreciate mr. Tolliver for bringing that group together and the friends
Treasure island. There are some great buildings there. Along the lines, this project, i know this commission was interested in getting a review on this project. There is a category 1, 11 building on preservation. It maybe worth looking the entire project and its influence on that building early in the process rather than later. Commissioner highland . I was just wondering if any of the projects or the buildings are at risk and if they are, is there any benefit in prioritizing them. They still have ceqa protection. Especially in this midcentury modern projects throughout the city, actually. That might be a way to, i dont know how long it would take if we identify the projects that exist that we can protect it further . The only one that comes to mind aside from perhaps buildings at risk for development within the Pacific Heights neighborhood as commissioner wolfram mentioned is the mothers building because its in such disrepair and we are glad the park is whether or not to preserve the
Have an Apartment Building essentially on both sides, an 8unit building and 4unit building and the project to the east the garage at the very rear of the residential building because it sneaks up the hillside there and seeing that doing something that maybe they can do something that would be code complying that would add the dwelling units that may still require a variance but adding onto the existing buildings did not seem very practical when you have a through lot like this and would call for or encourage an exception to a lot development. In which case the lots dont qualify and the variance is required. A variance could be justified for this location however i have concern about the overall scope of the overall project and neighbor project proposed here would not be one granted a variance. Seeing there is willingness for everyone to get together and discuss alternatives and im happy there was some discussion and alternatives discussed and im disappointed it did not carry it through