No, i dont think there are there is additional ver figureation. Gherting information that they believe to be true and correct. There is no additional verification. This is agency policy; correct . Senator mccaskill . The agency is not permitted to spend trust fund dollars or a limited administrative tax account on items that dont have a Program Purpose and thats the basis on which we dont verify nonbeneficiary reports senator mccaskill okay. I completely get that but you understand the commonsense argument. Tell you me you do. I do senator mccaskill okay. We have a bill. This is an agency we call it let me google that for you because this is an agency that the vast majority that theyre supposed to be distributing is easily Available Online and they are the Distribution Source for the public desk master file. Have you all given thought if we get rid of it which we should because its a waste of money. We have not considered an alternative distribution method because at present they serve
A very welcomed discussion weve were in the midstream of the postcards campaign we delivered 3 thousand postcards to the mayor with the letter weve had from the department of aging a few months ago and were in the period of the supervisors to talk with their dissatisfy and deliver the postcards to them and to give the direct number weve been asked to come back to talk with kate howard of the Mayors Office for the dollars were going to have a boarder discussion thats tomorrow i want to invite out to a rally on the steps of city hall today it came up suddenly a combination serving the elderly for the Disability Advocates were doing a rally about fair share for fair care the need for serves and care for the seniors with disability at city hall today hopefully, this meeting will be done and youll walk downstairs not that we planned it that way. And then on monday our case meeting the regiment 3 to 5 on open hand may 11 and mary will do a presentation on bio metrics to help support folks an
Think if im interpreting it correctly suggesting not collecting data but those shelters are picking up people up and dropping people 06 i guess my question is can the mta collect data without having the shuttles operate and people getting on and off and generating is there another way to collect data. Not that im aware of. It seems like if one acceptance and obviously will there are different views on the Data Collection it seem like you need the shuttles to operate. Thats right. When we talk about control Impact Environmental impacts again, the impacts just looking at the scale of the system. So my understanding is that muni has about seven hundred thousand board of supervisors a day right now yes. And my understanding is that the shuttle system that is the times its operating in San Francisco has been 30 thousand boardings a day. Thats correct based on what we know. So the mta understanding the entire system has 5 percent of the entire muni system. Thats the equivalent yes. Given the
Early projects and weve being been using it on Market Street. To see if some of the changes on Market Street would again have the desire effects for vehicle traffic and the overly network and, of course, Pedestrian Safety and Bicycle Safety from reducing the vehicle traffic on right turns on market. A classic exception has not been challenged before the board of supervisors. We work with the project sponsor whether the sfmta or not sponsor to develop a program in our professional view fits within the class 6 exemption. One example of the project that changed is sf park proposed to apply to existing motors and some new meters based on neighborhood concerns sfmta removed the new parking meters so the physical changes soccer field with that project from the projects that were proposed for the classic. The second question we heard from former supervisor he mentioned the sequa boing plan i can speak that that appeal used for environmental arguments to create more bike lanes was tragic we kn
Entire system has 5 percent of the entire muni system. Thats the equivalent yes. Given their focused on the shuttles cross the county line that go into San Mateo County than the inner city shuttles and the appellants lawyer i heard that apparently those impacts of the inner traffic city shuttles are dramatically lower if i heard him correctly so if we look at what the appellants are focused on the shuttles across the county line their 20 percent of the overall shuttles . Based on on what we know yes based on what you know 65 or seven hundred thousand boarding vs. 65 thousand boardings a day for the cross county shuttles thats a little bit less than one percent of the daily boardings of muni. Im not a quick calculator but sure i think if my math is correct its a little bit less than one percent i think its reasonable to assume most people are going to be boarding twice a day one thought or half of the 65 hundred boardsing tape in San Mateo County were talking about probably about a litt