Thank you supervisor, its great to see you here after eight years of working on this. My name is Fernando Marty and im representing the council of Community Housing organizations. I am also the district 6 representative in the eastern neighborhoods cac. And i worked at asian neighborhood design while this plan was under process. We have been here before, where we encounter a tendency to pit Affordable Housing and Public Transit as though it was a zerosum game and something that is very interesting about the plan, that it presents itself as building a complete neighborhood. Creating a balanced between the many needs. Over those eight years people came, argued, discussed, created compromises and came to conclusions about how to best serve the many needs to make those complete neighborhoods. We talk about the impact fees that exist, the housing fees, transportation fees, which are by the way, one of the largest pieces there, 22 million for Public Transportation will be created through thi
Impact Development Fee does not cover housing at all. And when the transit sustainability project and fee, a discussion that were having right now, i dont know what your confidence level that well see significant changes from the tdif. And well see what happens. But i wouldnt hang my hat on that. So great. Those are my questions. Supervisor kim. Thank you. I was just going say that i know well have a robust discussion after public comment, but i wanted to note that some of our folks have been waiting for two hours to speak. So i wanted to get quickly to those as possible, but president chiu. Just to add quickly to the discussion. I was sitting in the Capital Planning meeting that the estimates of transit needs, and i would love to see for next weeks meeting what type of tradeoffs that were looking at . And what the benefits or successes have been of what we have already done in the umu district . Because i think and agree, these are both very important needs. We also appreciate the nee
About 6 million of that would come from transit and transitrelated impact fees. The only thing im not sure about there is we would have to look at the Development Potential site. Obviously the numbers used for 900 folsom is a large site , but we could do a more elaborate analysis of those sites within western soma for information next week. But for this week, such an analysis wasnt quite possible. But based on those numbers, if you project that out, using 900 folsom as an example, those numbers sound accurate. Again, if we converted those to the sites available in western soma, i think we would get a different number. Maybe its not 6 million, but 3 million or 4 million, but still in the millions. Im sorry . I said whether its 6 million or cut it about a third, 4 million or even in half, 3 million, i would imagine its in the millions. Potentially. It also depends if were looking at a fullcapacity. You know, if every project built to its full capacity, what would those numbers be or what
But that is bad idea. We will cover all of that first. We want to get to will ripley in china. You are live with us and help us understand what north koreas threat means to the u. S. What are they saying . There really has been a lot breaking within the last hour. I want to read you part of this message this warning from north korea just within the last hour. They had the u. S. Needs to stop with its delusion of trying to harm us by clearly understanding the strategic status of the dprk which soared up as the worlds nuclear and missile power and our military and peoples strong will to revenge our enemies to instruction. This warning coming after north korea tested an icbn that. You much of the u. S. Mainland within striking range and President Trump tweeting very angie apparently with china for not doing more to stop and sole the north korea problem and saying i am disappointed in china our foolish past leaders have allowed them to make hundreds of billions a dollar a year in trade and