The commission with that and if it is the case there is no expeditious way to do that and the only way is to actually go through the more formal process of requesting the consolidation of positions and a new position is created at least we will know that. Mr. Fried, ms. Miller do you want to add anything to that . Okay. Why dont we open it up to Public Comment. Good afternoon again commissioners. Eric brook representing San Francisco green party and the local organization our city. First a technical point on all of this. I was under the impression and check with dhr on this that the executive position still exists but filled on an interim basis. Maybe i am wrong on that but good to make sure youre correct on that from the staffs perspective. I agree bringing it back in house because the next year is going to be really big for clean power sf and some other things and we need somebody that can be available five days a week, 50 weeks a year. I mean thats really going to be important, but
Program position, take away some of the restrictions so that position could be used to fill in the executive officer position, so those are the two options, and i personally think that we should pursue bringing the position in house. I also believe that we have very capable staff that can step into that but i also want to make sure that we have this discussion, and that we have a discussion not only about the outcome, but the process that we want to follow because thats very important, and it maybe that you decide that you can bring the position in house but you follow a different process. I just want to make sure that we have that discussion, so with that i will open it up to my colleagues. Commissioner avalos. Thank you chair campos. I would like to see it brought in house and i think a process for going through that. I think its important that when we have a position open up and go through a search as part of it. I think thats just the process i feel most comfortable with overall al
Know that. Mr. Fried, ms. Miller do you want to add anything to that . Okay. Why dont we open it up to Public Comment. Good afternoon again commissioners. Eric brook representing San Francisco green party and the local organization our city. First a technical point on all of this. I was under the impression and check with dhr on this that the executive position still exists but filled on an interim basis. Maybe i am wrong on that but good to make sure youre correct on that from the staffs perspective. I agree bringing it back in house because the next year is going to be really big for clean power sf and some other things and we need somebody that can be available five days a week, 50 weeks a year. I mean thats really going to be important, but the main thing i want to focus on is that the advocates for clean power sf have had some concerns with the way that lafco when we originally set set up lafco to work on clean power sf and especially get at the beginning of 2007 and what we neede
Point on all of this. I was under the impression and check with dhr on this that the executive position still exists but filled on an interim basis. Maybe i am wrong on that but good to make sure youre correct on that from the staffs perspective. I agree bringing it back in house because the next year is going to be really big for clean power sf and some other things and we need somebody that can be available five days a week, 50 weeks a year. I mean thats really going to be important, but the main thing i want to focus on is that the advocates for clean power sf have had some concerns with the way that lafco when we originally set set up lafco to work on clean power sf and especially get at the beginning of 2007 and what we needed from lafco and i believe the intention we needed somebody on task for clean power sf itself that could approach the sf puc on many occasions the sf puc wasnt thinking outside of the box on this to put it politely, and we need someone, and i think we will nee
Public works so article 16 to transfer the maintenance to the adjacent Property Owners but outlines the steps so prior to the transfer of trees the are tree needs to be inspected theres no immediate maintenance required we have to post a notice on the tree and provide information for tree care and address concerns and have a public hearing as requested by someone that has received a street tree so, now some of the challenges for the tree transfer we have many Property Owners that are unwilling to care for their trees theyre facing maintenance and some of the trees are large trees maintained by the city tend to be healthy and larger so if we are transferring those trees in many cases are transferring robust trees to Property Owners one of the biggest concerns of the concerns of qualify of cares and the destruction of trees and loss the efficiency of scale by having one prove or disprove maintain one tree and another company to be hired to do the maintenance this is what i mentioned 24 i