Here theres a photograph let me show you the photograph. President chiu. Sir why dont i suggest, sir. Why dont i suggest rather than you trying to present this consider asking both parties to present the information and bring back the hearing three weeks from now to give the departments time to respond any only question who shall and i i direct this information to. This board of supervisors and actually we did that i dont know who screened them but well be happy to provide them again. Okay. I i understand may 20th i want to give our city departments to review the information and give feedback unfortunately, theres not a meeting over is 27 so it will be june 3rd so supervisor breed we transparence a motion to get the information by the 20th and the city departments can provide us with any analysis on the third make sense. Yes seshtd by supervisor kim. Any discussions i want to concur it will be significant to get more information from dpw when were making decisions it is very difficult
Years. Or one other item is the general Obligation Bonds as recently as the 1970s some of the equipment needs and facilities meets for example, the street lights used to be funded by the geobonds theres a lot of needs for the geoprogram and the needs to out strip the property taxed affordable so it means higher property tax thats a trade off. The capital deferrals every time we look at this were trying to balance and minimize the risks so weve made one hundred and 55 million cuts on top of that thats the best if we have more cuts in capital deferrals i have to responsibly tell you and the Mayors Office it comes with risks and thats the operational failures. Otherwise program cuts would happen we have Energy Efficient spending we think it is important theres the good solar sf funding and the multiple build out spending those programs are important for us as the Public Programs and those are a difficult choice and lastly the operating costs the house Senate Budget thats related to power
The things weve talked about and were not prepared to back down from making sure the possibility of a real Clean Program in San Francisco is a real possibility. Thank you okay. So let me significant this why dont we go through our presentation i think youve heard strong comments and well have our budget analyst talk and well entertainment the discussions. Thank you. I appreciate the supervisors frankness harassing as was requested we provided to our office as well as the Controllers Office all the scenarios over the 10 year process weve considered and the choices went from difficult to hard and not an easy solution so we want as well as staff weve worked claifb with the Mayors Office and well work with you bus those are policy choices their between hard and todd i really appreciate our showing me the different scenarios what i asked for was written down options theres not been a strong effort to make that communication i made that request of controller and thats not been done saw ill c
I had questions about what kind of professionals are involved in this i want to start to put together a team of people to help me get through this. Im a Structural Engineer and im thrilled at the quality of the contractors and engineers weve taken one civic awesome and put all the vendors in one place. You have financing and engineers and contractor and they come here and every were rebuilding are that the office of the city of administer and the depth thought i environment and other partners. All those things one little piece of a resilient piece of and i felt more positive about things i thought about how to pay for this. We didnt want to have one financing option it didnt work. We found information about financing they are different options for different types property owners. Weve seen them offering financially and a pool of styles for a complicated way of saying theyll be able to pay back their loans over the next two years. We have 3 options and secondly, to get a loan for the ry
Amount of an increase and whats emerging ill did you at the end is kind of a strong debate between the legislation and the legislator how to proposition the cap and trade with the fuel distribution in 20015. Turning to the bills of interest. That weve been tracking youll notice if you flip through here theres a number of bills that we recommend those are the ones introduced for one reason or another failed to move into a second reading so we have 3 bills were recommending for support on the agenda the first one is a bit 2690 on page 23 of the matrix it reconciles language for the dui section of the penal code a reference to previous convictions and the language thats more up to date is separate so that you can take account for somethings thats going on concurly and we recommend the support to make the streets safer in San Francisco. Sb lovingly 83 an interesting measure were recommending support it been carried on the matrix before as a watch it was what package it this on. Im sorry pa