10 of a very big number so we need to have a more aggressive approach i think. Its important to do that but we need a more aggressive approach. That wont quite hit it. And the other thing i wanted to mention is that the work that local power has done is first of all its preliminary and secondly its really a framework for talking through all the issues and its fairly complex as everyone who has encountered it has recognized and there are a lot of assumptions made that have a lot of implications in the way things turn out but its a framework where we held the discussion and pull out the issues of different approaches, different scenarios and what not, and thats been a fruitful discussion to have, and we would like lafco to urge that that kind of discussion continue to sort of pull out of those deliverables the types of information and analysis thats richly embedded there as opposed to start thinking automatically of alternative approaches which initially dont seem to be as comprehensive
These values of public safety, Good Customer Service, accessibility and sustainability. And weve heard a lot of comments are the ble report so i wont go into the details about public safety, but we know include insurance and vehicle inspections and clearly marked vehicles, drivers training, background checks, et c. We have noticed through our Enforcement Team that there has been an up tick in violations associated with street hails of non tnc vehicles and non taxi vehicles so this is something were concerned about. General public drivers picking up street hails. Last week in the last few weeks there was a registered sex offender actually found to be trying to pick up a street hail so this is a real concern to us when private vehicles that are not clearly marked are providing services so we know the values of Good Customer Service and non discrimination. All customers are required to be served in the taxi industry, all neighborhoods are required to be served. We can do better on that. A
Saw in the last week is that because of some of the critiques of that model we have been working on for a couple of years the staff has proposed going to a completely different model that is building large solar farms at a distance in front of the meter so they have go through pg e transmission and distribution lines and these would be sold the more expensive way to do renewables and all of this is going to roughly double the cost of the rate on energy to the customer, so its vital that we get the lafco to send a strong message to the sfpuc hey thats not good enough. We need the local distribution and the local jobs. We need to get back to the other model and make it work. Thanks. Thank you. Any other member of the public would like to comment please come forward. David mc cord. I am the chair of the Energy Committee and San Francisco has a great opportunity here now to develop really first Class Community choice aggregation system and right now there are two models presented. One by p
Opted in and not opt out, and as mr. Brooks said lots of jobs for San Francisco residents, so i would like the commission to send a strong message that for puc staff to work with the local power to develop the best cca that is possible. Thank you. Thank you very much. And next speaker please. Good afternoon folks. Alwine from the Clean Energy Alliance and i have the great opportunity to be chairing those stakeholder meetings that take place, fairly contentious of recent time. I wanted to address two questions quickly. One is a question of the rates and the high rates that i think everybody concerned about it at roll out time which according to the proposals that have been put before the rate fairness board are roughly somewhere depending on your tier between 18 and 30 above current bills, and its really important that we feel, the advocates, and the commission itself feels to really lower those rates and i wanted to say we encourage every effort to do that. That the proposal youre putt
Puc staff to work with the local power to develop the best cca that is possible. Thank you. Thank you very much. And next speaker please. Good afternoon folks. Alwine from the Clean Energy Alliance and i have the great opportunity to be chairing those stakeholder meetings that take place, fairly contentious of recent time. I wanted to address two questions quickly. One is a question of the rates and the high rates that i think everybody concerned about it at roll out time which according to the proposals that have been put before the rate fairness board are roughly somewhere depending on your tier between 18 and 30 above current bills, and its really important that we feel, the advocates, and the commission itself feels to really lower those rates and i wanted to say we encourage every effort to do that. That the proposal youre putting forward supervisor campos would not make a huge difference in those rates. I mean looking at the numbers is that the rate recovery is roughly in the ord