Page 4 - Proposition 12 News Today

In this opinion piece, Blake Hurst, a Northwest Missouri farmer, discusses the recent Supreme Court decisions and the impact they will have on producers around the country.

Agri-Pulse is a trusted source in Washington, D.C., with the largest editorial team focused on food, fuel, fiber and farm policy coverage. Agri-Pulse presents a balanced perspective on a wide variety of issues.

The Court’s ruling means that Californians can continue buying pork products knowing they were not produced using extreme confinement practices – protecting not only animals but also workers who handle these products every day from harm caused by unsafe conditions.

The Supreme Court’s decision to allow California’s animal housing law to remain in place caused a furor in the pork industry and among farm-state lawmakers, who vowed to introduce legislation to overturn the ruling. But its more immediate impact could be felt in the approximately half of states that allow voters to craft law through ballot initiatives. 

SCOTUS upheld Proposition 12, finding the law is not an unconstitutional violation of the Court’s dormant Commerce Clause precedents, despite the Biden administration’s concerns that the decision would substantially disrupt the nation’s pork market.

The Supreme Court has rejected a challenge to a California animal cruelty law that affects...

The Supreme Court has rejected pork producers’ arguments that California’s Proposition 12, which bans the sales of pork coming from sows confined in gestation crates, violates the Commerce Clause.

WASHINGTON (CN) — The Supreme Court allowed a California law governing pork standards to move forward on Thursday despite industry claims over its broad reach.

The American Farm Bureau Federation and National Pork Producers Council challenged the ability of one state to set agricultural production standards for the entire country.

Commentary The major reason why America is so prosperous is the Interstate Commerce clause of U.S. Constitution. It ...