Page 2 - Prosecution Perspective News Today

The difference of volume in materials recovered, and also because trumps conduct raised questions about obstruction. and in cnns new reporting, its revealed how much evidence prosecutors have and how significant the legal threat is. >> terrific reporting, paula. thank you very much. stay with us, as we bring in our guests. the trump team cant find this document, but prosecutors do have this recording. how much does that matter in terms of the special counsels investigation? >> what the special...

Of how would a child be prepared, and why the mother may be looked at, criminally, in this particular instance. that adds to those questions about law enforcement would surely be asking. >> yes, there is no question about that, lauren. i think that you really have to look to when youre examining this from a prosecution perspective. you, know as you know, there is a saying, law, that the risk of perceives as the duty for fines. what does that mean in english? certainly, its a risk in the event th...

>> i am glad you raised that point, it does add to the idea of how a child would be prepared and why the mother maybe look that criminally. that adds to those questions that law enforcement will surely be asking. >> there is no question about that. you have to look at it when you are examining this from the prosecution perspective. there is a saying that the risk to see is the duty to find, in english it means the risk is leaving a gun where a child can get a hold of it, you would receive the du...

Awaiting a lot for this probable cause affidavit understandably. the details and they will be unsealed as i understand it once hes in ohio -- idaho, rather. what are you looking for in ter terms of details w, what will i tell us. >> it will tell us a lot. it will speak to the issue of probable cause. why is he under arrest. what is the justification for holding him and for going after him from a prosecution perspective. number one, im looking for dna. was his dna there? and does it establish, yo...

Expressing and use that to have evidentiary value? the supreme court declining to hear that case, but it is not an uncommon thing. and lately it has been a question of fact as to whether or not from a defense perspective we say this is pure nonsense, from a prosecution perspective we say this is exactly what their intent was, this is direct evidence of them suggesting it, the jury can make that assessment ultimately. >> lets talk about the charges, joey. because these are really serious. i mean,...

Times that obviously you have to tell a story that a jury that needs to be compelling. in any case, you have two professors, one professor being the prosecutor. and that prosecutor is advancing one narrative. and the defense advancing another. i think in this particular case there couldnt be more divergent stories told that jury. from a prosecution perspective they were trying to paint rittenhouse as an active shooter. well in order to do that you had to demonstrate he was indiscriminately shoot...

Bigger fish could be some where in the white house, lets say. that would be the biggest fish of all. so of course theyre going to try to use as much as they can to get any potential witness to snare someone who is a much more attractive target. >> nick, from a prosecution perspective, turkish president, theyve been watching this case very closely, they want the u.s. to drop this case against this businessman but how alarming is it that theyre so concerned about this case and what it may mean for...

High bail, the videotape is going to corroborate that and theyll walk through. in the alternative, those who you see in the videotape who were engaged in shooting and who were hitting and everything else, well, they have some problems and they have some explaining to do. the issue then from hey, i did nothing to i was merely defending myself. >> the videotape is helpful from a defense perspective, and im sure as mel can tell you, its helpful from a prosecution perspective, as well. >> all right....

Defend the lie charge and then, of course, when youre structuring and taking out 106 times, money that is less than $10,000, that it equals $952,000 you have explaining to do and can you prove 23r from a prosecution perspective you were structuring in such a way and withdrawing it in such a way to evade reporting requirements and that is the basis of the charge here. to the extent its transacti transactional, the government can show the amounts he was withdrawing and the dates he was withdrawing...

That time does it transcend the bounds of that to now jump on top of a hood of a car, where youre exposed. and then the question becomes from a prosecution perspective, well if they had a weapon and you really felt that you were in danger of you dying, why would you fully exposureself jumping on a hood and firing rounds into that car? unless you intended to kill them and knew that they posed no threat to you? and so thats what needs to be balanced. was that the proper thing to do in accordance w...