community for a good reason because of the safety risks inherent in the job. the president, by encouraging people to out the whistle-blower is a form of retaliation. importantly here, remember, this is akin to shooting, although figuratively, the messenger. this whistle-blower complaint has been corroborated by more than a dozen witnesses. dana, you well know, the president and his team released a pseudo-transcript that also confirmed details. i m not sure why the whistle-blower is nothing more at this point than an ups delivery driver. legally responsible if going happened to the whistle-blower? i think it s a stretch to connect the dots, maybe more of a tangential, but the spirit of it is there, if the president or any member of the federal government is encouraging a violation of the law, there should be consequences. the whistle-blower is a red herring. we ve moved beyond that at this point. they re trying to distract by focusing on that. thank you both, i appreciate it.