Page 16 - Pull Factor News Today

Other on february 16th. meeting in the exact location these migrants met. the 2,000 to 3,000 in tijuana we followed. you are talking about a significant number. upwards of 15 to 20,000 people of caravans. why is this happening? the biggest pull factor is the new president of mexico. he is pro-immigrant and helping these people. he let them walk through gates. i walked with them. he gave them this visa program that they stopped but not totally done away. in the "washington post" today mexicos pos...

Bag and go back down. we knew way back when that how this original caravan was handled would determine whether or not more are coming. its called a pull factor. the border patrol is turning blue in the face why this matters. they have determined, based on stagnant government shutdown that we have got that it was time to come again so here they come. rachel: its bigger and stronger as it moves up. its going to get big irin el salvador and more people in guatemala. coming up north. people organizi...

There more caravan on the way we have heard that does he know he? says he knows for a fact there is at least a third or fourth caravan still coming with about 1,000 people and when you talk about the border patrol having pull factor meaning its a pull factor to bring more caravans. people are in route from central american countries until they fully know exactly how we, the united states and the tijuana officials at least here is the san ysidro port are going to handle the situation. another fin...

Going to be a magnet. people are going to flood the borders, trying to take advantage of it. and so im curious, if thats constantly your problem every time this issue comes up, then how can you entertain any kind of comprehensive immigration bi bill. >> i understand the question. if we put together a package and pass it, the conversation is over. there are those who will receive some sort of permanent status. thats what the president has been very clear on. he also favored two bipartisan bills. ...

Would be a pull factor. so what were trying to do is do them in conjunction. some people here that weve talked about giving permanent status to. but at the same time we have to close these loopholes so when we do that, we dont pull up another huge population told by the smugglers, go now. go now. that is not how it will work any more. thank you for your time. but let us and sarah know and well continue to you give you details as we get them. but thank you for your time. thank you, secretary ni...

Determined that the department has a good idea that involves people, technology and infrastructure. fair to say in the comments and date why from the department it would just be disingenuous to say anybody is proposing a large wall? >> yes. >> bill: lets talk about the pool factor. if you learn nothing else from the amnesty of 1986 you learn if you dont address the pull factor all youve done with amnesty is invite a lot more people in waiting for the next amnesty. what has been your experience s...

Seems the president came here, has listened to be people at the border and has determine thad the department has a good idea that involves people, technology and infrastructure. so itd be fair to say in the face of the direct comments and the data now from the department, it would just be disingenuous to suggest that anybody is proposing a large, monolific wall? >> yes, sir, itd be disingenuo disingenuous. >> if you learn nothing else from the amnesty of 1986, you learned if you dont address the...

The results of the human traffic themselves. and the little boats that they put them on in the sea. many dying and suffering as a result of that train and people, coming from turkey and parts of north africa as well. you would think that we would have some semblance of introspection over this. maybe we do not allow the boats to come over. maybe we do not start rescuing people who have been human traffic there, bringing them into europe. it is the pull factor, only encouraging the human trafficke...

Court, detention, so when they get their due process and a federal judge orders them removed, that order needs to mean something. or the whole system has no integrity. nowhere else in law enforcement has anybody asked law enforcement agencies to ignore a judges order from a bench. theyve had their due process, our job is to enforce those orders and thats what we do. and for the people that say that we concentrate too much on those that are not criminals beyond them committing a crime of entering...

At great taxpayer expense, billions spent on border security, immigration, deattention. when they get their due process and a judge orders them removed, that has to mean something or the whole system has no integri integrity. nowhere else in law enforcement have they asked the agency to ignore a judges order from a bench. for e people that say that we concentrati secentrate too much that are not criminals, you should ignore them? they have been here let them go? that is what drives what happened...