Page 4 - Question Basis News Today

Notion that he would not be a radical judge, and that he would respect 50 years of precedent. and of course, he did not. >> i mean it is such a reversal that not only did he say he was going to respect precedent but in his opinion overturning roe, you talked about how precedent was not good enough for this, that this was a wrong that should overrule any sympathies toward precedent? >> egregiously long. if he knew that, and he has felt that all along, if you go back to that memo from 1985, then y...

Clear majorities would vote for supreme court justices, no matter if they were introduced or nominated by an opposing president. >> yes, and but i dont think there was anything, at least there is no notation in the diary by ted kennedy that i really dont like this guy, but he was, he was wary, he had been around politics for a long time, and he knew that the republicans, he knew george w. bush, he worked with w. on education and other things, and he did sense the landscape. key see where things ...

The entire subpoena and he said he has a privilege and he shouldnt have to testify and the judge may denied that and said no, there are hundreds of questions that the prosecutors could ask that have nothing to do with your potential speech and debate clause protections. lindsey graham appealed it to the 11th circuit and they kicked it back to judge may and said, judge may, try to figure out on a question by question basis what lindsey graham might have speech and debate protection to and what qu...

Gonna be asked, and then, on a question by question basis, you assert any relevant privilege you think may apply. you cant just say, i cannot be asked anything! after. ever. also, the time period in question here they wanted to ask him about this 2020 and 2021. in 2020 and when hes on one, steve bannon was a broadcaster, not a presidential advisor, he was a broadcaster, and nothing against podcasters. some of them are our best friends, right? but did not work in the white house or for the govern...

He denounced it. he put on a little red face and yelled about tv cameras. and im sure he enjoyed that, but its not, thats not a legal response. a subpoena is a binding thing. you have to respond to it. he claimed the reason that he was defying the subpoena was executive privilege. that president trump had a right to his counsel, as a government employee, and he couldnt violate the private sanctity of his advisors an official adviser to the president. legally speaking, that is a pile of corn knot...

Put somebody on trial for a crime that serious is when they lay out and make records of everything theyve done. the question we will get at tomorrow, though, is not just about what they did, but about who else might have been in on what they did. sedition, seditious conspiracy is using force to try to stop or overthrow the government. the justice department we know because they have indicted, they believe they have the goods to successfully prosecute multiple members of these para-military group...

Defying the subpoena was executive privilege, that president trump had a right to his counsel and he couldnt violate his sanctity of his advice as an official adviser to the president. legally speaking that is a pile of cornid nuts. i mean first of all, if you want to assert that you cant answer questions because of some assertion of executive privilege, a, the president, the former president has to assert the executive privilege, its not clear that that ever happened here and alsoe, what youre ...

Are already a whole bunch of guys about to be on trial for seditious conspiracy and tomorrows question is as to whether or not the trump white house and other trump associates working on it with them, and should bear or potentially face the same criminal charges. now, i mentioned there might be more video tape tomorrow than we were otherwise expecting for your typical criminal conspiracy. part of the reason i think we should c be sort of ready for tt tomorrow is because of this, which we recentl...

Of whether or not there was a privilege. and it already been waived by the person who owns, at the current president of the united states, joe biden. but he needed to at least show up and assert it on a question by question basis. by refusing to appear at all, he broke the law and refused to comply with a subpoena. you cant remedy that after the fact, but i think he can create some confusion with the journey, by raising this issue that donald trump way the issue privileged in until july. now the...

But he needed to at least show up and assert it on a question by question basis. by refusing to appear at all, he broke the law and refused to comply with a subpoena. you cant remedy that after the fact, but i think he can create some confusion with the journey, by raising this issue that donald trump way the issue privileged in until july. now the other issues the money raised, is that he really wants to come in and testify before the committee. if he does, i think hes gonna come and drop some ...