complaint spawned this impeachment inquiry is highly unlikely to testify before capitol hill. there have been discussions for some time to bring this person in. perhaps employ extreme measure to guard their identity and do it off site but concerns over the person s safety and new op-ed from the whistle-blower s attorneys who said the whistle-blower does not have any information beyond what is already out there, what is already in the complaint and can t provide congress with any any information and a new letter that we re just seeing today from the senate sent to the senate intelligence committee which is also asking for the whistle-blower s testimony saying gyp the events of just the past 24 hours let alone the past three weeks to include threats from the president of the united states, our client is now only willing to communicate with both committees through written interrogatories, questions and answers. they re saying only written questions they ll respond to, not any in-person in
women owned their bodies for the first time. so no one really talked about anything before that sexual because it just wasn t done. now women were coming out. they got to live a little freer, and there was something to talk about. i don t know if you read my latest book, advanced sexual positions, how to achieve them without laughing. in 1969, dr. david reuben wrote a book called everything you want to know about sex, but were afraid to ask. woody allen thought it would be funny to do a sex comedy. he licensed the name of the book and then used the same format as the book, questions and answers. proceed with erection. the scene i love was inside the genitalia as they begin to ejaculate. prepare for launching. woody allen and 4,000 other guys are dressed as sperm. nothing s funnier than a sperm with glasses. hey, we re going to make babies! woody is the neurotic sperm who s afraid about shooting out. what if he s masturbating.
know whether he lied or not. how is she going to figure that out? the government will put f.b.i. agents on the stand and they will say here is what we asked him and here is what he told us and what why we believe it s a lie. when you look at what they say you will see the road map of where the mueller prosecution team is finally headed. harris: what is the end game now for the prosecution? it appears that the end game is to find whatever evidence this is not necessarily the end game. we have been doing this for almost two years. whatever evidence they can find about the president s involvement in illegal activity. the easiest case for them to prove is conspiracy. because it s just an agreement. it doesn t actually have to have been consummated. we believe that from the documents that jerome corsi released just yesterday which show what the guilty plea was that they wanted him to enter which he eventually declined. harris: all right. real quickly, back to manafort for a second.
prosecutors. the guy does not give up. so he will keep hitting these guys. and look, look at the building blocks that he s created so far. he s indicted 12, 13 russian nationals who were spies, who hacked john podesta s e-mail, kendall s 100% right. supposedly those were the e-mails that stone was talking about and that were obtained, clearly illegally, and then released before the election. this all didn t just pop out of the sky and happen. there was a coordinated effort. it s going to play out in a criminal court, is my guess. on the presidential interview, i don t want to get too law school. we re out in florida, it s a balmy evening. but there s this word, interrogatories. it refers to when lawyers exchange written questions and answers. and they re pretty worthily, would you agree? lawyers think they re worthless? absolutely. they re written by lawyers, not the client.
written questions. only written questions were submitted to the legal team who are right now preparing written answers. the q&a will all be in the form of written questions and answers. joining us now is legal analysts, thanks very much for joining us. just to be precise, it only involves the questions. this is what the trump legal team agreed to. what happened during the campaign about alleged collusion or conspiracy to deal with russians interfering in the election and all of that. it doesn t deal with what happened after the president took office and nothing to do with obstruction of justice and the firing of comey, for example. the president s legal team has been successful in delaying this process and let this process really take a long course. here we are at almost two years into his administration and they are just about to maybe answer questions about this in writing