Page 28 - Radar Data News Today

>> you know, i would say much of this is the result of the hard work of the aviation community taking accidents, taking lessons learned and plowing them back in, whether its the design of aircraft or training of crew members. and even passengers. and we cant stress this enough, many accidents are survivable. its about knowing where the exits are and listening to the flight crew in an emergency situation. very important. >> and let me ask you, i hope you heard our richard quest who reported that ...

Boxes out of the aircraft that give you the rate of descent and not interpadvertising of radar data that comes off of a commercial web site. what were the engines doing? spooling up or down. and the other thing is,ie witness testimony is notoriously unreliable in criminal investigations and specifically in the investigation of aircraft accidents. they are so traumatized. and there are reports that when the airport hit it ripped off the tail and the airplane flipped up side down. look at prefire ...

After four years of investigation, an electrical short circuit inside the plane was declared the culprit. but now, 17 years later, a new documentary claims to have proof to support a not so new conspiracy theory about twa flight 800. >> what we do show in documentary is solid proof that there was an external detonation, but we also have corroborating information from the radar data. >> primary conclusion was that the explosive forces came from outside of the airplane, not the center fuel tank. >...

But now, 17 years later, a new documentary claims to have proof to support a not so new conspiracy theory about twa flight 800. >> what we do show in documentary is solid proof that there was an external detonation, but we also have corroborating information from the radar data. >> primary conclusion was that the explosive forces came from outside of the airplane, not the center fuel tank. >> would that statement have been in your analysis? >> if i got the write one. >> according to its press re...

The explosive forces came from outside the airplane, not the center fuel tank. >> the agenda was that this is an accident, make it so. >> the now retired investigators say they have new evidence proving a missile caused one of the countrys most deadly plane crashes. that evidence includes faa radar data, explosive residue in multiple locations of the plane and witness accounts of a rising streak of light through the sky. the documentarys producers and the former investigators suggest a cia, fbi ...

Trying to get factual information that should have been made available to the public, we were able to analyze the radar data. at the time of the explosion, there were particles of debris and matter traveling at mach 4. >> youre saying that the fbi, with the help of the cia and your bosses at the ntsb manipulated evidence, doctored evidence, lied to the american people and covered up a crime or something caused by the united states military? >> i never said that. what im saying is the facts and c...

The original ntsb finding is untrue. what is that evidence and what are you and your colleagues saying happened to that plane? >> witnesses say a missile shot down that and physical evidence supports that but in terms of penetration, nitrates found on the aircraft. when we reconstructed the interior of the airplane, which is a job i supervised, we found there was no correlation between the victims, the infor your and for that matter, the explosion which suggests a high degree of separation of pa...

Public, we were able to analyze the radar data. at the time of the explosion, there were particles of debris and matter traveling at mach 4. >> youre saying that the fbi, with the help of the cia and your bosses at the ntsb manipulated evidence, doctored evidence, lied to the american people and covered up a crime or something caused by the united states military? >> i never said that. what im saying is the facts and circumstances of the accident were not as portrayed by the final report. ly say...

Everybody has heard about eyewitnesses see something come up from the surface and the air national guard pilot said it was an ordinance explosion in the area. we have radar data that confirms this, an asymmetric explosion coming out of the right side of the aircraft, consistent with the direction of the object that several, many, dozens of eyewitnesses saw, heading toward that plane, before it went down. >> weve heard about radar data before and its been debunked. is this the same radar data you...

Been false united statified. a documentary out next month is attempting to prove just that. >> what would your analysis have been? >> the primary conclusion was the explosive forces came from outside the airplane, not the center fuel tank. >> would that statement have been in your analysis? >> if i got the right one. >> the agenda was, this is an accident, make it so. >> joining us now is tom stalcup, he coproduced the film. these are stunning allegations. what new evidence are you actually brin...