Page 9 - Radar Data News Today

Have something that supports their theory here? >> absolutely. they are going to have to provide any kind of factual information, if they have radar data, satellite imagery through the military. if there is some evidence that they can provide to the public that says that this was a missile shoot-down and that it was unintentional or intercepted any kind of communication that they were taking claim and they were able to dispute it or refute it, that type of information is going to have to be publ...

Initial reports that evening showed some anomalies on a radar that was mistaken by someone by the faa as a missile hitting the plane and later on, it was determined to be sop sort of electrical interference that happens all the time. but sure the radars were critically important. >> the fbi hung on to every bit of the radar data and they tried and tried and tried to connect those dots, if you will, and despite their best efforts, they were not able to prove that that was a missile that came up t...

Handshakes fails on accuracy youre back to that position. you really are back to the very beginning of where the mystery begins. and once youre there, frankly, you are calling into question the corridors, youre calling into question the inmarsat and ultimately the radar data. >> david souci, i talked to david gallo about this a couple of days ago about the human search, is there data that nothing has been found, that momentum for the search will somehow be lost? >> well, i think just the energy ...

Frequency. and that disturbs me, but then again, i think this airplane is still in the ocean. >> on the issue of the pings from the black boxes, im going to have to disagree with you, as much as it pains me to do that. >> arthur, you traffic in disagreement. >> i do. i do. i think those pings were right on. i think that the frequency difference, the 37 1/2 kilohertz which were all making a big deal about. >> thats what its supposed to be transmitting on. it came in lower. >> i think thats reflec...

This is not one mans calculations on the back of an envelope. >> jeff? >> it absolutely is. you can have as many experts as you want, but theyre all just making guesses. and there is no certainty in the outcome, except if you look at the bottom. listen, one thing i want to remind you, the towed pinger locator has a range of one mile. if you look at an theyre is ten miles across and its not in that area, it simply does not correspond to a black box pinger. >> go ahead, arthur. >> i said it last n...

Its not just the pings. its also the inmarsat satellite data. its the radar data. and its the pings. three separate analyses which all coalesced in this particular area. the way i look at it is the pings are a microscope that give us a more probable location for the airplane. but even the pings define a large area which has to be surveyed with sonar. so i believe that theyre looking in the right place. i would not be surprised if they found the record soon. if they dont, theyre going to regroup....

And mary, you kind of dont want to think of this possibility, but we have to, behind the scene, do you think that investigators are prepared for the worst? for this possibility that we will never find out what happened to flight 370? >> well, i think the leadership probably is. the people out in the field searching the ocean and running the blue fin are focused on that mission. and that requires them to search those areas very thoroughly. but im sure angus houston and the malaysian officials are...

If this does, if these particular search areas, the limited search areas, do not turn up the plane, then theyre going to have to go back to the inmarsat data and make sense of the many, many conflicting reports of radar data out of malaiysia and indonesia and othr places and try to make sense of those and see if there are not new search areas that can be opened with better analysis or maybe more cooperation from governments in terms of their radar information. >> all right, mary, david, michael,...

We simply have taken the word of the authorities at face value. the americans have been saying this. the malaysians, the australians have all been saying take our word for it, its in the southern ocean. i think if we dont find debris in the surface, if we dont find wreckage under the surface, the question is going to become deafening, where is this plane? why have you been telling us that its in the south? we dont need to go to crazy conspiracies i think to want to know why do we think its in th...

That doesnt make sense to us. >> and watching these press conferences as well to see what angus houston has to say. we get the most information from angus houston. >> yeah, it seems to be, very much so. >> are we beingmalaysia and the that theyre doing here. . >> well, i would like to say yes, but not really. i mean, so very important. even simple things. you would expect a simple answer. the thing thats quite irritate to me is the business with the malaysian radar. where were the military and z...