million jobs, lower the unemployment rate by 1%, and lower raise gdp by 2%. i think the proposal the president made selected the types of programs that independent analysis think have the biggest bang for the buck, but we need to do many things at once. we face three great challenges. first is the sustaining job growth. second, invest in the future, continuing to educate, innovating, and investing in infrastructure, which would also help right now. thirdly, as we discussed in your office, we need to get on a sustainable fiscal path. we need to do all of that, and that includes entitlement spending. none of us want to talk about it, but does it not include real, sustainable, economic plan in any trajectory, we have to deal with entitlements. i think the president has alluded to it. i do not think he is on board, but he talks about it. what you said is exactly right. we need to look at the whole budget including entitlements. the fast growth is in medicare and medicaid. i
dough defectors pay brokers in china to contact their families, and they get dvds, flash drives and balloon launches. north koreans, especially the eleads, are keeping up with south korean soap operas, and watching south korean and western films. it s more important than over to raise the human rights concerns so they know our concerns are for them. for example, it was a brilliant action by the obama administration to include special envoy for north korean human rights, ambassador robert king in the delegation that went to north korea to investigate the food situation. it s the human rights in north korea that are causing the starvation. furthermore, north koreans are no long dependent on kim jong-il to survive, and because of farmer markets and the capitalism is saving them. kim jong-il s unprovoked attacks on south korea, as congressman paine mentioned, have awake ended south koreans to the truth, we must not ignore the human rights of north koreans for the false promise
first, but some of the extensions. so, people have less money to spend, and they don t spend it and the recession gets worse. i believe that is why the first package of the stimulus package prevented a worse and a deeper recession although it wasn t perfectly designed to do that. what do you believe? i agree. i think that s that large and immediate cut in spending certain kinds of spending or more stimulant than others. it s quite interesting to me that we have delayed extending unemployment insurance. we know again on the employment insurance and a healthy economy could convince workers not to take jobs but in this kind of economy the unemployment is hard to make that case, and the money is a very powerful stimulus for safe food stamps and other things. and i find that really puzzling that some economists will say well, any talk of the tax increases anywhere at any time has a terrible depressive affect but cutting spending right now is perfectly fine. that flies in the
translator: i found out after i was out of that hell on earth can t 18 why i was sent to prison camp, because my father had dissented during the south korean war but by then i had nowhere to go and complain that the situation. i would like to say that the term of north korea is a living hell for human beings, a place where people have committed so-called crimes percent and incarcerated as a group and forced to work emanuel slave labor manual slave labor. [speaking korean] translator: there are prison camps where people have been found guilty of being against for those resisting the regime are sent intel whereas in places like camp number 18 where i was incarcerated in besides political prisoners, those were guilty of economic crimes are sent along with family members and forced to work in coal mines [speaking korean] [speaking korean] translator: in camp number 18 where i was in prison the whole prison camp was encircled by a 13-foot high the electrified fence and