Page 36 - Rahul Kumar News Today

Under the Bihar Rural Livelihoods Promotion Society, Bihar’s government announced the development of a new Program for Immersion and Learning Exchange.

PATNA, India, Apr 10 (IPS) - Under the Bihar Rural Livelihoods Promotion Society, Bihar’s government announced the development of a new Program for Immersion and Learning Exchange (ILE) to be headquartered in Patna.

A Scroll analysis of images uploaded on the rural employment guarantee scheme’s website suggest they provide no check against potential fraud.

Tushar Shah of Rich Offset & Rich Prints (Rich Group) shares his reasons to invest in ERP Solution from Renuka Softtec

A court here has ordered framing charges of rioting and arson against five people for allegedly setting ablaze a mosque during the 2020 northeast Delhi riots, saying their identification through a video cannot be termed illegal or inadmissible in evidence at this stage.  Additional Sessions

The Ahmedabad Cyber Crime police detained two persons for allegedly issuing threatening messages to the public on behalf of a pro-Khalistan group against attending the India-Australia Test cricket match hosted at the Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad on March 8.

A Delhi Court has framed charges against five men for allegedly setting on fire a mosque and other articles lying therein like the Quran, carpet and CCTV cameras during the 2020 North-East Delhi...

The FIR was registered in Karawal Nagar police station based on a complaint that stated that the Allah Wali Masjid at Shahid Bhagat Singh Colony was allegedly set on fire during the riots.

Get latest articles and stories on India at LatestLY. A court here has ordered framing charges of rioting and arson against five people for allegedly setting ablaze a mosque during the 2020 northeast Delhi riots, saying their identification through a video cannot be termed illegal or inadmissible in evidence at this stage. India News | 2020 Delhi Riots: Court Orders Framing of Charges Against 5 for Rioting, Arson.

The court said that the petitioner “cannot claim any right based on some information available on the website” which is contrary to the supplementary examination rule in the prospectus.