Latest Breaking News On - Rajiv atma ram - Page 1 : vimarsana.com

State Seeking Opinion From UOI On District Judges Appointment A 'Serious Assault' On Independence Of HC's Functioning: P&H High Court

The Punjab & Haryana High Court on Wednesday, directed Haryana to accept the recommendations of the High Court made on appointing 13 judicial officers as additional district and session judges and...

High Court Annuls Appointment Of Panjab University's UILS Head From A Non-Legal Background For Violation Of BCI's Legal Education Rules

Observing that to be the head of legal education the person should have "minimum prescribed qualification in Law" as per UGC Regulations, The Punjab & Haryana High Court has set aside the order of the...

Pleas in High Court, Chandigarh Administration reconsiders EV policy

24 Yrs Later, Punjab & Haryana High Court Awards ₹5 Lakh Damages To Man Denied Naib Tehsildar Post Due To Miscalculated Marks

The Punjab & Haryana High Court recently awarded Rs. 5 lakh in damages to a man who could not qualify for the Naib Tehsildar exam conducted in 1996 due to a miscalculation of 2 marks.Justice Sanjeev...

Ex-Chief Justice moves HC against 'surveillance cameras' at CJ's house

3768 Tribune News Service Chandigarh, July 20 In virtually a Chief Justice-versus-Chief Justice case, a former Chief Justice and Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, Justice NK Sodhi, today moved the HC against the installation of “surveillance cameras” at the residence of the present Chief Justice. Living opposite the official residence of Chief Justice Ravi Shanker Jha in Sector 4, Karnataka High Court’s former Chief Justice Sodhi claimed that the high-resolution, infra-red cameras installed on the “tall poles” violated his right to privacy. His counsel Rajiv Atma Ram, Arjun Partap Atma Ram and Brijesh Khosla contended: “The cameras can record persons and cars and other vehicles coming to, leaving, going in, and going out of the petitioner's residence; they can look into the front and the side portion of the petitioner's built-up house. Thus, there is an invasion of privacy of all residents of (his) house number 36, Sector 4, Chandigarh….”

Ex-CJ moves HC against installation of 'surveillance cameras' at Chief Justice's residence : The Tribune India