Air taxis may become the premium mode of travel in the future U.S. transportation ecosystem. If a current NASA study returns substantial information, there is vast potential for air taxis quickly carrying people relatively short distances, and eventually some may fly without a pilot aboard.
them by race. that wasn t the question, tom. i m answering the question. don t jump in. tom, you haven t answered in three days. i was asked a question, let me answer it. in the rasa studies program it s 90% hispanic and directed toward that race. they re teaching them just about their background. i m going having kids learn just about their background. tom let me jump back in. the question was are they open to all the students? the answer of course is yes. that s why you didn t respond. no, it s open, but let me finish. if only latino studies are going in there, we need to diversify the class, and of course raza studies only focus on latinos. just like european history only focused on, surprise, the history of europe. there s nothing wrong with that. that s who we re supposed to do. the only point is we re not
it s a case for arguing for it absolutely positively separates students by their ethnicity. it does not. why else would you call it african-american studies, rasa studies. by it s very nature, it should be, can you teach this in world history, american history. that s not true. the standards of arizona, the chairman of the history channel television network came here a few years ago, she said she had read the 50 standards and arizona s were head and shoulders above. it s called african-american studies because they re the focus of the curriculum. it s not a nonsek witnesser. students of america take european history. it doesn t mean you have to be european to take it. we want all students to take african-american studies, all students to make asian studies. they all make up america and that s what we want them to have access to. and if people are dividing people by race tracks, that s a problem, buts that s not an argument against ethnic studies that s an argument on a sc
saying if you are an hispanic american or an african-american, you must take a certain track of ethnic studies is completely against the notion as my boss talks about with dr. king s speech and in 1963, where people should be judged for the content of their character, not based on the color of their skin or ethnicity. a lot of these kids that come from families that came from mexico or colombia. is there something inherently wrong in them taking a class or two in high school that explains their heritage? of course not. we would absolutely support a comprehensive curriculum that does in fact cherish other cultures. not excluding and certainly not segregating by race. that is the exactly the opposite of the message that the american public education should be doing. but it s factually untrue to suggest that the curriculum advises teachers to separate people by race. even if that were the case that s not an argument for getting rid of ethnic studies.
level for how people are administratoring the program. all data suggests that students have have access to ethnic studies programs do better on the aims test than people who don t take it. so even in the terms of the educational aims of the state it makes sense for everybody to take these educational courses. what about that point, doug. isn t it make a case, if you re like first-generation american, your parents are from mexico or somewhere else, doesn t it encourage that kid it make more of an interest in study in english, studying in school, which is going to help him become more assimilated. if part of that education includes something about where he came from? there s no reason why we would oppose the idea of learning about other cultures. it is the separating the one your parents came from. with a particular emphasis on the one your parents came from. is there something you see something wrong with that? do you see something wrong with that? i see something wrong when y