Govt will decide on Covid vaccination of children, adolescents on 'scientific rationale', supply situation: V K Paul | India News - Rashtra News : Rashtra News #Govt #decide #Covid #vaccination #children #adolescents #scientific #rationale #supply #situation #Paul #India #News #Times #India NEW DELHI: The government will take a final decision on vaccinating children and adolescents
one simple change that happened in our society over decades and especially in the last few years by the left. they removed the term biological sex and replaced it with gender identity. title ix used to be about biological sex making sure women and girls had equal access to sports opportunity and every opportunity. now by redefining that very important word it means men have access to the that, too. it does set up clashes, men who identify as women. no rationale to prevent them from participating in these sports or being in these locker rooms. it will set up a flash in states that have drawn sane lines what is permissible or not. it is a federal mandate or decision. so riley gaines is correct. the other bullet point was sexual harassment. in college campuses it has gotten to the point where you are guilty when accused if you
was lousy. the rationale states, 'we haven't changed anything, we haven't experienced any safety of flight damage in 112 flights.'" the concluding sentence -- "the rationale was lousy then and it still is..." what i take that to mean is that linda ham is raising a concern, but they appear to rely on the fact that previous flights which had suffered this foam loss, had returned safely. in other words, "we've gotten away with this". this is a failure to learn from past similar events, simply because those flights did not have catastrophic consequences. the classic -- the classic normalisation of deviance. -you have to make sure that every incident is thoroughly investigated and properly assessed. and that wasn't done for the 112 foam loss.
before we schedule the next launch." -in other words, again, they were thinking it was more of a turnaround issue. and so, it wasn't preventing shuttle flights from going forward. -the pressure on the management team to stay on schedule and the concept of, "it's just foam" is leading the charge through all of this. -so, it wasn't like they weren't talking about issues at all, but there certainly was a big focus on the -- on the schedule. -here's an e-mail, it's tuesday january 21st, this was sent six days into the columbia mission. this is a private exchange between linda ham and ron dittemore, two of the top managers in the program. "the rationale for flight for the sts-112 loss of foam
>> and waco, talk about the connection. >> it was really amazing because mark and his reducing partner, daphne peterson, discovered video of timothy mcveigh at waco. he was handing out the antigovernment brochures and you know, talking to a lot of people. we have sound bites from him at waco and he was very upset about the government overreach there and what was he exactly upset about in waco, mark? >> he was very upset that the same military vehicles that he had used in the gulf war were being used against american citizens. and in his mind, to see the militarization of law enforcement. >> but it was also the drugs, the drug angle, right? >> that was the atf, came up with a clear rationale, really. >> a rationale so it would legitimate the use of military
>> the other reason is, you are seeing so few -- you don't have to get too technical. you're seeing so few shares trade because real money managers, pension funds, they are not buying this. because they have a fiduciary responsibility to their investors. they need to turn to their investors and say, this is the reason i purchased this stock, and they cannot give rationale. that's why it's only mom and pops and individuals. i read the washington post story as well, but donald trump has been a grifter in business for decades and decades. he has gone bankrupt six times. the last time he had a publicly traded company, it went right down the tube. if you choose to buy this, i'm supposed to feel bad for you? >> yes. >> why? >> you are talking about mom- and-pop, people putting their life savings into something like this. you have to have some sympathy for people that are going to lose their pensions or whatever their investing. >> i did donate my $100 profit,
we are in this space where you have the jesse watters of the world and trump decides to retweet them. how much responsibility is judge juan merchan going to be able to put on donald trump for re- tweeting something that someone else said as a violation of the gag order? many in the legal community are very curious about this and it will be something that judge juan merchan one way or the other will have to provide a solid rationale for. >> i am not going to make anyone listen to donald trump this early in the morning. but he has said the gag order has to come off. people are allowed to speak about me and i have a gag order. to show you how much more unfair it is and the conflict has to end with the judge. i increasingly have trouble reading these quotes because the syntax makes no sense. but we knew he was going to use this courthouse as a campaign stop and that the grievance is part of the political strategy. >> he has no choice because he is in court.
marjorie taylor greene gave our colleagues an tearful as she exited down the capitol hill steps. i'm sure you heard about that. if nothing else, when you saw her leaving the vote, inside the house on the floor, she did a big thumbs down. we have video of that. what is the explanation for her rationale, this behavior and her position? >> reporter: she voted against a to ukraine for more democrats, even by a little bit, more democrats and republicans voted to send like eight overseas despite the fact that there were so many speeches. they have been around here for a long time. even mike johnson said multiple times this week and this is different than his position as a rank-and-file member. i have seen the intelligence. if we do not provide aid to ukraine. let us be clear. some of it goes to them directly and a lot will be to replenish our own stockpiles.
to the court and said his testimony ran hollow and untrue. that credibility determination made by another judge is something that's really central. and as you say, credibility's always important for michael cohen or any fact witness and the like. but it's incredibly important for someone like trump. if he decides to take the stand, the prosecutors, it's totally fair game for them to say hey, you know, why should we believe you this time. so i think that's where it will go. the third rationale not offered directly, but i think is going on in the new york ag's mind, and matthew colangelo comes from that office, they want to remind the judge that this is a guy who'd already violated a gag in order another case and faced severe sanctions. that takes on additional salience because donald trump has been repeatedly and grotesquely violaing the gag order this week and will be the subject tuesday in this case. >> neil, does he or doesn't he
today, but twice. they are not just in line with the majority of people in arizona who do not want this draconian ban. they made it clear since this ruling that they want this ban repealed and if republicans in the legislature don't do the right thing, i know that voters are going to hold them accountable this november. >> then why are these republicans doing it? right, they want to be in office. they want to get elected again. if even republicans in your state don't want this ban, what is the rationale they are giving for blocking it? >> well, you would have to ask them that. but from my position, it looks like they are just playing political games with women's lives in arizona and it is beyond unfortunate. we know that this ban is going to have devastating consequences for access to health care. not just for abortion, but across the spectrum of pregnancy. and these republicans are just