screen to follow. stay right here on the screen to follow. stay right here ayman is up next. good evening, tonight, the coordinated attacks on the justice system, a campaign of vengeance. trump is finally held accountable. a i knew investigation that looking into the efforts to keep the criminal court off of its back and harvard s new policy of silence that reveals a sad truth about where we are in america. showing empathy is now somehow controversial. let s do it. immediately after trump made history last week becoming the first u.s. president to ever be convicted of a felony. republicans rush to his defense and they have not left his side ever since. we saw the ex-president and his ride or die followers echoing the same. people get it. it is a scam the republican party they stuck, they stick together. representation of the justice department, the fbi, that is all coming out of washington. i think anybody who is not speaking up in the face of really something that sh
Transcripts for MSNBC Ayman 20240604 23:16:30 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
i understand it. other condition. and it ignores all of the ethics that really show a possible appearance of impro priity. and of it. the judges are going to sit on a decision about the january 6th events about the immunity. things that they chorally got the appearance of impro prity. it is not a serious argument. it needs to be answer. but it is part of what the press publishes that trump and his supporters say. we will delve into that later in the program. i want to get your thoughts on this. the analyst said quote the da s charges pushed the outer boundaries of the law and due process. perhaps suggesting normally these charges would not have been brought to bear. what do you make of that? reporter: what i make of it,
objecting. dr. merchan bent over backwards to give him a fair trial that it is unfair to everybody else. let s turn to how other legal experts have been responding. you have, for example, new york magazine. one expert laying out how the jury did its job and did it well there are other outstanding issues with the judge including the judge donating $35 to the democratic party back in 2020. yes $35. an ethic s board dismissed this complant. what do you make of these kinds of critiques. do they have any validity at all in the way that the trial played out? these are only for political purposes. to go to the base. the donald trump base. they have nothing to do with law or ethics. nothing to do with the appearance of impro prity. it was not directed to biden as
and lock uphillary clinton. michael flin went out there and said lock them up. he was all about it. it did not happen for whatever reason. there is a deeper question. does trump truly not remember saying that? and there is a lot of signs about him and what he says and i am not a doctor, some cognative issues, and he does not look well, either. he said it, we know it, trade mark of his campaign, now to say he did not say it, it is ridiculous. and also he thinks his followers, his voters are going to live in their, you know, isolation chamber. they will not see this clip on msnb. they don t watch msnbc so he can lie to them on fox and friends and nobody will hold him accountable, certainly not on that network thank you very much. next up, rules for the but not for me. trump s outcry about his