lds. us any more after that. us all right. but you ve never you ve never had a desire to haven: a mustache, ever. oh, never. you want to try it and make a bet? oh, yeah. laui actually think you shou grow a mustache for charitable when we make a bet . laura: okay you can make that my payment. to you. okay, that s a reall y cash.an yes. okay, that s perfect.e we and we ll be able to showd our crews mustaches and compare. all right, sean, great. comparshow tonight.later. i enjoyed watching you watchingn it.grah all right.am, this we ll see you later. i m laura ingram .s inm t we hthisav is ingram angle frm washington. tonight, we have some breaking news from journalists chris ru. that we re going to bring yout s in moments. and once again, the leftt thos is seeking to use the department of justice to target thoseout. who speak out,l this time against those who oppose radical gender surgeries. those details are just moments away. awbut first, unnatural disaster. noat s the focus of t
the unprecedented move that he had made from the secret service to the white house. this was at the time not a huge story, but it did have very serious ramifications in the long run, and it s reall y in hindsight that you see why the implications of such a dramatic move are so significant, because it really drew the line between a political entity and what was supposed to be an a political entity, and when that happened it raised many more questions about specific security decisions that were made, because people began to question, especially people who were highly critical in general of the secret service and some concerns about really deep loyalty to the former president, whether certain decisions were made because they were in the best interest of safety or if they were in the best interest of the former president s political agenda. those are really the long term implications of that really unprecedented move. with me, she answered the question.
hey, this stuff is coming up and then not pursue itself? i mean, greg said corruption is another plausible possible explanation or is this reall y our top government investigative agencies deciding to put their fingere ag on the scale yet again? well, this is raises a much more fundamental question. the whole issue whether you can depoliticize the fbi, involvescize justice. but remember, this involves people appointed by republicansn and appointed by democrats. we have to change the system. we have to create a kind of special counsel that involves investigations of political people and the people conductingl people investigatioe cannot be appointed by the president, cannosidet be partis. they have to be people who are above reproach. former judges. professor olmer, real quick, that s that seems like a panel of experts which almost never ends well. so who chooses those special