Page 141 - Recourse News Today

Things we want handled. he seemed to say he hadnt seen that so far, but they are looking. if it seems like all of this is coming from one side of the aisle and theres no pushback and the government, again, is forcing a private actor to act on its behalf, theres a place where you cross the line there. we dont know, but another dump is coming today the as well. will: real quick. lets say that case was made, its clear that there was a first amendment violation, what would it mean? whats the recours...

Intimidates someone, then that is a serious matter. it brings the law into line with what is ready the case, quite rightly in my view, for harassment on the grounds of race, for example. it used to be the case in which it was not uncommon for people to be harassed on the grounds of their race, now it is quite rightly very unusual and shocking. if you heard someone shouting abuse against someone because of the colour of their skin, everyone would realise that was totally unacceptable and an offen...

Institutional interest. we want them to be successful. were going to help them be successful. but its not just not the way that congress or the executive branch operates, where one branch says to the other, gives all your files. we dont say that to the justice department. ive never seen it said to congress. were making sure they get what they need and we want to do that to the degree theres remaining information as soon as possible. >> congressman mccarthy has threatened to kick you off the comm...

But we are making sure that we are getting what they need, and we want to do that to the degree of the remaining information as soon as possible. >> congressman mccarthy has threatened to kick you off the intelligence committee if he becomes speaker when republicans take control of the house. what will that mean for you? you would essentially have no recourse. isnt that correct? >> you know, they could probably force me off the committee if they choose to do it. what we are seeing is kevin mccar...

Where state legislatures would be able to influence laws and how they could be held accountable. no recourse in either state or federal law, and that can have incredible ramifications for not just law, and that can have incredible ramifications for notjust how law, and that can have incredible ramifications for not just how we elect members of congress, but also presidents. you elect members of congress, but also residents. ., ., ~ presidents. you would think the su - reme presidents. you would ...

Raise for border patrol agents and resources for u.s. customs and border protection and speeding up asylum processing and that key add that it would extend title 42. that is the public health authority that allows for the expulsion of migrants at the u.s./mexico border. and in ex change for all of that, it would provide a panel way to citizenship for around 2 million dreamers. those are undocumented migrants who came to the united states as children. now, this is legislation we have been talking...

Legal or civil recourse that you would have against the people who violated your first amen amenamendment rights? >> i can guarantee you one thing, more than anything else you will hear, i will be getting a lawyer and i will be suing the national committee, the democratic national committee no matter what. i am going to stand up for the rights of every american and not so-called celebrity, i am not a celebrity. i am hardly recognized anymore because my career had been destroyed by these very peo...

Yours. yours. i of legal ord have civil recourse that you would have against the people who violated your first amendment rights? >>endment rights? one thing more than anything else youll ever hear in thse youll ever hear in your life.g else you will hear, i will be i will be getting a lawyer. i will be suing the democraticth national committee no matter den or lose, fttee no matter i am going to stand upor fors of the rights that every american a not a so callelld celebrity. br. im not a celebr...

Every legal recourse has not actually been pursued up until this point. so, why now? >> lets unpack this. we asked bill clinton what them is is. were talking about it. on the one hand, there is the january 6th, the idea of white house counsel and the deputy having to testify in a criminal grand jury investigation. january 6th related. then theres the mar-a-lago documents. so, there are maybe two bites of the proverbial apple to test this theory of whether the window is closed. when you think abo...

Theyve gotten some of it but not all. we know because merrick garland told us, he said the ahis press conference, we would like to have all the transcripts and evidence so that we can use it in the ordinary course of investigations. the committee members since then said theyll get it but if they do itll be important information for the criminal investigation. >> the lingering things related to subpoenas that havent been responded to. theyve been ignored by people like kevin mccarthy. how could t...