Summer now and fourth summer, wow, so this is the fourth summer and i think part of the challenge coming into this was not ever having a coordinated effort or a place for the young people to go where they can have the applications come in and on the back end have Jobs Available for them so this is everybody has been doing their own thing making their own connection and having their own relationships so this whole effort is tremendous just in terms of the relationships that have been built over the years. Having said that theres a lot that still needs to get done. I think part of what we have been talking about as a team is how do we ensure that those internship programs that exist is folded into the work were already doing, so we have departments that created their own so we have been working more closely with people and project pool and the rec and park and the airport and dpw and make sure those jobs are folded in as well and were really thinking about the different cohorts of kids t
We will share more details with you throughout the presentation. And at this point i would like to ask deputy superintendent lee take us through the slides and the budget and the current state and how that affects this potential appropriation. Thank you, superintendent and thank you supervisors. I will speak to one slide, its a story, its a graph that tells an important story about the history of our funding over the last five years. And some of you i believe have seen this before. So i appreciate you indulging me. And this revenue funding is the primary source of funding for School Districts in california. Most School Districts including ours. And the left of that chart is from fy200708. And it show that is we received on per unit average daily attendance funding of 5776 per student. Six years ago. And the top line, the blue line shows what the state should have funded per unit of ada to meet their statutory cost of living adjustments. Thats based on a formula in statute. And its repr
Parents and the students is something to work with. We fully back this proposal and we think that the ag requirement is a sound policy. But in order for it to meet its promise and capacity you need the adequate support to carry it forward. Thank you. Good afternoon, i am a member of excelsior and bay hunt community. The school board and the district took a bold step to align the District High School requirements with the requirements for the uc system. And this said to the state that San Francisco is serious about the requirements of the district. The realistic issues that came with this change, when standards are changed and raised, we have the responsibility to be sure that all students are supported to meet those standards. That is why Credit Recovery is such a crucial piece of the promise that the city made to their youth. The success and College Access and Career Readiness for all students. The promise is tenacious due to the deep cuts. And securing Credit Recovery for the student
Into our reserves and we will be faced with sequestration and child care and we have competing needs. If you are asking the city to put in reserves to pay for this very worthy cause. That i think that the School District is saying is a priority. Why wont the School District put in reserves as well . Thank you, sorry i had to be out of chambers for a moment. But we have a significant priority on ag. And hope everything you have heard from the sfusd team reinforces that. We have the 2014 group front and center in priorities in every respect and including funding. We have set aside funds in the 1213 budget to help meet these targets. We can give you a report on the debatails of that. And in addition we think that in the coming years we will reexamining our budget for 1314 and beyond to make sure we maintain the critical investments. I will say that one of the events which i think you have heard about is the loss of 21st century funds did come at a relatively late stage in this process. So
Orange line. That shows the actual. Not inflation adjusted. Just the actual amount of revenue funding we have received for each student. Instead of going up and matching the blue line or even staying flat. Matching the purple line. We have seen significant reductions shown by the orange line. We went from 5776 to 5326, a steep drop in the following year, 0910. And a little loss recovered but then treading water since then. That last line, 1213 where it splits between the 5204 and the 4764 level, that represents the outcome of prop 30. If it had not passed, we would have additional reduction of more than 400 per student in the middle of the fiscal year. Because it passed, we are able to avoid the cuts and maintain the funding we had last year. But its not an increase in funding compared to prior years. This orange line started off at important but not cataclysmic different or short fall from the statutory funding levels in 0809. But that widened, this gap has widened. And when the super