Into the Hotel Business or the bedandbreakfast business to apply for a cu to have people stay longer than than the shortterm rentals that have past 90 days the option is still vail with a 90 day cap we have the Planning Department Ann Marie Rogers who is here to talk about how we currently apply the cu for folks who want to have a bedandbreakfast type of business in their home how often we actually approve and what are the rare instances we dont sea the types of conditions where the Planning Department didnt approve the cued. Thank you skoopz Planning Department currently before the Residential District other than the rh1 d you can seek the authorizations to become a hotel this is subject to the requirement the dwelling the process can take time but the quickest the is probably about 4 months with the anytime fee for a conditional use authorization is less than 2,000 despite the complaints weve received for shortterm rentals informing people the process most people dont choose to pursu
Rentals and people staying for short periods of time but over the course of a year occupying precious space for a long term tenant im proposing a cap of 90 days so it person can have an option to have a shortterm rental that adds up to 90 days or a permanent tenant and rules in place for people that want to go into the Hotel Business or the bedandbreakfast business to apply for a cu to have people stay longer than than the shortterm rentals that have past 90 days the option is still vail with a 90 day cap we have the Planning Department Ann Marie Rogers who is here to talk about how we currently apply the cu for folks who want to have a bedandbreakfast type of business in their home how often we actually approve and what are the rare instances we dont sea the types of conditions where the Planning Department didnt approve the cued. Thank you skoopz Planning Department currently before the Residential District other than the rh1 d you can seek the authorizations to become a hotel this i
Or i would ask my colleague if 30 days is not long how about we say 30 calendar days to fill that spot. But this four month and six month and lets drag it out to more and lets strop doing this is just an impediment to getting on with the thing. I will yield back. Whoevers time that was is expired. Gentlemen from florida, mr. Nuegent. I yield my time to ms. Sally. I think it is important for the committee to understand what this is and isnt. And a little history. It has never been against the law for women to serve in Ground Combat. But combat air craft and ships have been against the law but they were appealed in the early 90s. It was never in the law for women to be restricted from Ground Combat. This particular provision that is being slightly modified comes from 2007 or so just asking if any other positions were going to be opened putting another road block to extebbed, trip it up and create a barrier, but since then the department of defense decided it is going to open positions up
Please keep the questions short, identify yourself first. Jim toland. As a followup, clearly obamacare hasnt been the most popular legislation or program with the republican party. And it does seem like people talk about repeal and replace but theres much more focus on repeal. The question really is, whats the replace . Status quo wasnt working very well either. 50 Million People uninsured, its got to be more than well do it at the state level. Whats the program to get a program that actually addresses the pathologies of the old system without baggage of the new . Governor christie we should get there and talk about it but take a deep breath. Its may 1. You know. I dont quite frankly, i think all of us have to go about this in a responsible way. Theres been more emphasis on repeal. You cant replace until you do repeal. So theres been more of an emphasis on repeal. But the fact is that all of us who are responsible and for those of us who decide to run for president , its going to be ou
Instead of concluding the language we call out those specific types as youve described them as opposed to this general language. Thats any intent and hopefully with the support of the board and if thats accepted by the author of the main ordinance ill withdrew my amendment but i would ask the president in my conversations with the planning staff we can insure were going to include those types of unit weve discussed. So colleagues just to clarify supervisor mar your wrooug your amendment. Through the president is that your intent to be as boarded as we can about excluding the bmrs and the sros and the city induced unit. Thats my intent i seemed mount prop c and small fund income restricted and involve the lo low income rate that leaves the question around inlaws and that is one we should vote on. I withdrew the part of the amendment that refers to city substituted housing but lease in the part of new mexicos. And colleagues any other questions or discussed on any of the amendments last