That since they moved in, they have significantly landscaped their backyard with trees and tall shrubs on all property boarders. By doing so, have intentionally created their own box and shadowed their own property and it is impossible to reconcile this landscaping designed with the claim concern about the loss of visual openness, and boxed in impact. And with respect to miss smith. And i just mentioned that her house is larger than the laytons house will be after the addition is constructed. And her house extends beyond the layton house on the first and second levels and she has put fences on all sides of her property, and laytons project was approved by the Planning Commission, 40, but for the discretionary review application filed by the appellants with the Planning Commission, the permit would have been approved, administrativelisingly by the planning staff. And slight impacts to the neighbors are to be expected in connection with me building project. This proposal, or the permitte
Living space. They have failed to mention that since they moved in, they have significantly landscaped their backyard with trees and tall shrubs on all property boarders. By doing so, have intentionally created their own box and shadowed their own property and it is impossible to reconcile this landscaping designed with the claim concern about the loss of visual openness, and boxed in impact. And with respect to miss smith. And i just mentioned that her house is larger than the laytons house will be after the addition is constructed. And her house extends beyond the layton house on the first and second levels and she has put fences on all sides of her property, and laytons project was approved by the Planning Commission, 40, but for the discretionary review application filed by the appellants with the Planning Commission, the permit would have been approved, administrativelisingly by the planning staff. And slight impacts to the neighbors are to be expected in connection with me buildi
Pose. And is that incorrect . I was never contacted with respect to the story poles. Yeah. Please come forward when you are addressing. We were waiting to see if the plans were even approved by planning before we would do that and we didnt make a promise that we will do it and we said that we needed to see what was going to be approved and if the planning was going to come back with any modification and they didnt. Are you done . So mr. Sanchez . Thank you. Scott sanchez, Planning Department, the subject property is located with an rh one and that is a Single Family zoning district, and the permit application was submited in june of 2013 and as has been noted the extent of the work additions at the rear, and at the rear has as you can see and it is seen as kind of a mix of structure and it would extend it two feet further from the greatest depth of the building. And so that is how we would have described it in our notices. The Residential Design Team reviewed this after it was submitte
Boarders. By doing so, have intentionally created their own box and shadowed their own property and it is impossible to reconcile this landscaping designed with the claim concern about the loss of visual openness, and boxed in impact. And with respect to miss smith. And i just mentioned that her house is larger than the laytons house will be after the addition is constructed. And her house extends beyond the layton house on the first and second levels and she has put fences on all sides of her property, and laytons project was approved by the Planning Commission, 40, but for the discretionary review application filed by the appellants with the Planning Commission, the permit would have been approved, administrativelisingly by the planning staff. And slight impacts to the neighbors are to be expected in connection with me building project. This proposal, or the permitted project is significantly more limited than the allowed height and bulk permitted by the planning code and it will all
Boarders. By doing so, have intentionally created their own box and shadowed their own property and it is impossible to reconcile this landscaping designed with the claim concern about the loss of visual openness, and boxed in impact. And with respect to miss smith. And i just mentioned that her house is larger than the laytons house will be after the addition is constructed. And her house extends beyond the layton house on the first and second levels and she has put fences on all sides of her property, and laytons project was approved by the Planning Commission, 40, but for the discretionary review application filed by the appellants with the Planning Commission, the permit would have been approved, administrativelisingly by the planning staff. And slight impacts to the neighbors are to be expected in connection with me building project. This proposal, or the permitted project is significantly more limited than the allowed height and bulk permitted by the planning code and it will all