this. i don t know if you re going to see even if you re seeing him vote that way, in the grand scheme of things, what we re talking about is a whole group of people that are hoping that the government works this out and it s not going to happen. i have to say i m running down the names of the yes republicans offen the compromise, alexander, collins, flake, gardner, mrk carkowsky, rounds. all of those who would be considered conservative right. the substance was to the left of the durbin bill that was announced in january. i don t think even if it passed the senate it was going to get a majority in the house. why is daca so difficult? there are people on the left i think the left has found their way to accepting the wall. so do i. i don t think it s that, i think that now we have family reunification or so-called chain migration. and they want the issue. they ll throw whatever stuff
uncomfortable with armed camp schools. what about the rights of those parents. we worry about the rights of hobbyists more than the rights of parents sometimes. there are. but these sort of in stances can change public opinion on that question. i had a couple of meetings with various house republicans today and the thing that strikes me is it is not a question of their thinking we need to move on guns, but unfortunately we can t for political reasons. they don t think this is that s the right thing to do. they don t believe that it is a promising strategy for fighting this and things like armed guards, metal detectors, arming teachers, they sincerely think that is a better way to go. not to mention focusing on mental health. and i m not sure they are wrong. i ll pause and sneak in a commercial break. up ahead, is now the time to talk about this. will it ever be time. we ll discuss that with a member of congress after this. even with insurance, we had to dip into our 401(k) and it
people, the republicans, because they are the one with the responsibility, you are going to see more guns. i think it is a focus on safety in the schools, that everybody in the community is going to have to sign on to including people who aren t going to want to necessarily because it is going to result in more guns. more armed guards, more security, more magnetometer and more background checks and more guns, not fewer guns. and that is a line came out from republicans when they were shot at at the baseball game. steve scalise is still on a chair wheeling around congress and someone suffering with the kons quens of gun violence, he has not moved that far and said that he they were saved because the capital police had their own guns. so even in their own experience they say more guns is the way that kept me safe and way forward. there are parents, ramesh,
gunman had mental health issues and in this case someone did. the fbi was given a tip involving a youtube comment with his name on it said, quote, i m going to be a professional school shooter. the fbi acknowledges getting the tip but it is not clear what they did with the information. the other arguments to avoid debate might go something like this. well cruz shouldn t have been allowed on school grounds and he wasn t, he was expelled. the school should have been armed. in this case it was. a school resource officer was on campus and was armed. while the school should have been trained for this. and in this case it was. by broward county. the president said there were so many signs that the florida shooter was mentally disturbed. well if that is the case, why was he allowed to legally by an ar-15. based on the current background check system it looks like none of those red flags would actually show up on a background check to buy an ar-15. so maybe that is the debate we need to have.
these kids could really be deported. they may have some extra time because of the courts, that s what they re relying on. does the politics, because the president s plan is the only one that got 60 votes in a negative. is that why paul ryan brought it up? i think that the house republicans are going to put a vote up on on the good lot bill is essentially the trump bill. it is significantly more immigration hawkish than most of the pieces of legislation. they want to be able to say they passed the law. they have to try to vote on something. forget passing, the house hasn t even attempted a vote. the other questions, we re not clear the senate can pass anything, but even if it did, can something that passed the senate also pass the house. the house republicans want to pass something, because they