The room so that we could on the same page. If people feel there is no longer a need to do that i am open to do that but i am surprised to see if things have changed and we dont need that anymore so i am open to what counsel said but i would also say this i would have a problem if we cant do a joint meeting in january. I dont see why we wouldnt be able to do a joint meeting in january. I dont think i think that if the puc is really committed to this and is making it a priority we will have a meeting in january. I guess if we dont it will show the level of the lack of commitment on the part of this agency but i think if the commitment is there a meeting in january shouldnt be a problem. Thank you and i want to express that concern as well. I think there is a lot of urgency that we want to keep invected into all of this discussion and movement on cleanpowersf, so i actually like the idea of staff getting together from lafco staff and puc staff getting together as soon as possible. I am a
Thank you. Commissioner lindo. First i want to thank counsel for suggesting the plan and perhaps having a separate meeting. I think its a good idea for us to have an action, a vote, to have a presentation that we can then give to the puc and say this is how we see this plan working, and this is what we offer to you, and after having a discussion with enernex and a discussion internally to say what is it that we want . Because if we start discussing it the way i see it with puc it starts changing before our eyes and i would like us to have something solid because there is room to move a little bit but at the end of the day this is what were presenting and the way we would like to see it. I think there are staff issues to deal with before the discussion with enernex but a question i have for ms. Hale i am assuming when this gets presented to the puc commission that staff will be providing a recommendation of some form, and i have heard that youre anxious and exciting to continue this dis
Able to have some specific questions, and that maybe a board issue. The board may have direction there. I think that i appreciate that, and i do i would like to see on the staff level some sort of mr. Fried to keep me at least i am sure other commissioners posted on the resolution with the puc about the issues of the report, and whether or not there can or cant be a resolution; right . Because there maybe items that are in the report that at this point cant be changed or there wont be an agreement in some instances, so i want to know when we get to a point of resolving whatever the issues are or not resolving them so we can move to the next faidz of having a presentation. I am open to doing it jointly or doing it separately, so thats where i am at. Thank you. Thank you. Commissioner lindo. First i want to thank counsel for suggesting the plan and perhaps having a separate meeting. I think its a good idea for us to have an action, a vote, to have a presentation that we can then give to
Integrating those different kinds of supply curves to meet your total demand, your total supply need, and its those sorts of cost thats utility incurs that need to be factored into the overall cost structure. We had made that point many months ago in this proceeding, and now that the california puc spoke to that issue in another docket as to how to do that and how those costs should be bonn the Administrative Law assigned to this green Tariff Application that pg e filed said lets bring that issue back and get a fresh look at it now that the commission has given direction and tell us how it should work within the green tariff option so theres a short briefing period that the Administrative Law judge is providing for all parties for that issue. Part of what that reopening of the record does is resets the clock well, a couple of thoughts on reading the tea leerves around that. The Administrative Law judges face a statutory requirement to give the decisions within the commissions within 90
Necessary. Id like to think that, you know, well, im worried now that we are looking kind of flat footed and their goal is they want people to stay in the program, we did not have the Customer Base that we expect to have for a clean power sf and i think we have to do everything we can possible to make sure we have that Customer Base, theres a lot at stake moving forward and i would think we could explore today just how the puc and working with lafco and our offices can have a proactive response here that we can all take part in and make sure were getting our message out in a clear way. Ill let ms. Fox take id will happy to do that, and i think it would be helpful to summarize some of the key activities that are part of the customer notification and Education Plan because i think it will partially answer some of that, so the customer notification and Education Plan which i think we presented the overview of that to this commission at the end of november and our commission sort of approv