But it is not about that. Host max schuster did not publish the autobiography. Guest no he did not. I remember telling him what a great historical document took this book to those elections in what that said was it is a masterpiece but i do not want my name on the same book as albert. It is wrong but we will not publish a new book is not easy for a publisher to say that i am not saying random house i dont want to publish a separate probe. Host indiana please go ahead with your question or comment. Caller yes mr. Korda i have a question about the wars. With your work as a writer and they have presented but it appears 9 11 was the inside job. Guest i will not comment on that. It does not look like that. I think it was an act of terror. Host arlington virginia. Lhe groundwork for the modern, hightech world we live in by investing a tremendous amount in science and technology. The creation of the first satellite and the Defense Advanced Research products agency, darpa, and other endeavors
Climate change. That is the major challenge of the 21st century. Time is past where humankind thought it could selfishly draw on inexhaustible resources. We know now the world is not a commodity, it is not a source of revenue. It is a common good, it is our heritage. The consequences of Climate Change are fully known now. Were not talking about theories anymore. Were talking about certainties. If nothing is done, then we are talking about increasing temperatures for degrees by the end of the century. A need to stay below the threshold of two degrees. We are also fully aware of the consequences. It would mean we would certainly see the disappearance of many island states in the indian ocean and the pacific, and huge damage to the coastlines of all continents. The 25 cities that in 2015 had more than 10 million inhabitants 19 are located on the coastline. A huge number of individuals are directly threatened by the consequences of global warming. You can imagine the huge consequences that
City process this is a fiduciary board with an obligation to the board and funds so a point rigid point system may truant officer with the experience of discretion by the board as a fiduciary by picking the best firms for the system. I see okay. The other two classes is the lgbt seniors or a veterans i understand thats the system that sets up to exclude people as well maybe we can move this on. It has been moved. I want to address some of the progress theres been several Board Members that think this is the case in terms of not xhoud the pc a i think there is an inherent bias they recommended this position the other issue i think theres going to be in inherit questioning of why we include someplace not hunt this has not references from public be pension fund no references from the pension fund and excludes someplace that a superb i think that that might be preserved the references are important if i were in mondays be shoes especially labor id like look at the references the endorsemen
Recommendation. Is there a second questions. Does the motion include the site visits okay second. On site Due Diligence which i building is a new part of the process. And reference checking. I ask we accept staffs represents. Is there a second. Second. Ill vote against i for the reasons ive stated. When we come up with the four would you walk me through 1 through 6 and see where they fit in the scoring. We kaunt cant. Well, we have in the past. In a public meeting. Yes. It was shared that they were very close or that the cut off point came because theres a gig eir big differential thats how we arrived before so id like staff to giving me some type of cardboard how we came up with 4 thats not a magic number in the rfp that helped so is he craft a figure of 4 how did we arrive at that. Ill turn to ms. Porter. The more information thats disclosed obviously the fact that the next steps of the evaluation process theres no hard legal rule around this this is a matter of bits judgment for sta
Classes is the lgbt seniors or a veterans i understand thats the system that sets up to exclude people as well maybe we can move this on. It has been moved. I want to address some of the progress theres been several Board Members that think this is the case in terms of not xhoud the pc a i think there is an inherent bias they recommended this position the other issue i think theres going to be in inherit questioning of why we include someplace not hunt this has not references from public be pension fund no references from the pension fund and excludes someplace that a superb i think that that might be preserved the references are important if i were in mondays be shoes especially labor id like look at the references the endorsement and references and re789sdz are very, very important part so i believe that there might be the perception it might be bias because of hedge fund any candidates would say where why are you including someone and someone he will that as a inessential is reputat