we were giving press conferences, the ntsb was, giving a lot of information, the rest of the world doesn t do that, in this case, i know at the beginning of the investigation, they were cautious, they were really matching their words to make sure they were doing the right things, now, i think that because the eyes of the world are on them, every time they say something, they ve been scrutinized. they have multinational people participating. the chinese are upset about the process now as are others. we don t know this fundamental question. can we show the radius? that is what s heart sinking about this situation. it s just a massive amount of area to be covered for this flight at this point. if they don t know anything about its trajectory at the time it possibly went down, it seems like that s a hopeless amount of space to search. it is. it is a daunting process. and now with the chinese providing this image, all of a sudden they have to make a decision, do they take the assets the
searching to find the main wreckage point underneath the ocean at about 15,000 feet. let me ask you this. i don t want to suggest the answer to this. i want to ask it because people on the internet are asking it. do you feel like we re getting the whole story? we re being told everything that s known by investigators, it simply is the case this is a mystery to all involved? or is there some part of you that s skeptical that some information is being held back at this point? unlike here in the united states where we try to be very transparent the ntsb provides a lot of information early on as they know it the rest of the world doesn t work like that nor are they required to work like that. i have a feeling that there is some information that is guarded and it should be guarded because it needs to be vetted. it needs to be validated before they put this information out for public consumption. you have family members that are hanging on every word, and if you re wrong, this early
answer to this. i want to ask it because people on the internet are asking it. do you feel like we re getting the whole story? we re being told everything that s known by investigators, it simply is the case this is a mystery to all involved? or is there some part of you that s skeptical that some information is being held back at this point? unlike here in the united states where we try to be very transparent the ntsb provides a lot of information early on as they know it the rest of the world doesn t work like that nor are they required to work like that. i have a feeling that there is some information that is guarded and it should be guarded because it needs to be vetted. it needs to be validated before they put this information out for public consumption. you have family members that are hanging on every word, and if you re wong, this early in the investigative process, you could jeopardize the credibility of the entire investigation. there s a level of caution with the words
let me ask you this. and i don t want to suggest the answer to this, but i want to ask it because people on the internet are asking it. basically do you feel like we re getting the whole story? i mean, is it possible we re being told everything that s known by investigators, it simply is the case this is a mystery to all involved, or is there some part of you that s skeptical that some information is being held back at this point? unlike here in the united states where we try to be very transparent, the ntsb provides a lot of information early on as they know it, the rest of the world doesn t work like that nor are they required to work like that. and i have a feel ing thing that there is some information that is guarded and it should be guarded because it needs to be vetted. it needs to be validated before they put this information out for public consumption. you have family members that are hanging on every word, and if you re wrong this early in the investigative process, you co
time tape for action this year? joining us now is democratic strategist erica. first to you, what s the purpose of this all nighter? is this more than just political theater. well, yeah. one thing the biggest problem is that congress is in deadlock, right? if you can t get anything done and if the conversation around climate change is so toxic that you have climate deniers at your home states and on the committees, what s the way to combat that? you change the conversation. so this is really about starting a dialogue, changing the context in which climate change is addressed within the senate. literally it s not like immigration, okay? immigration, everybody agrees that there s a big problem, that there s the system is broken and needs to be fixed. climate, half the kind of team that s supposed to be leading our country forward doesn t even agree that the problem xis at all. senator, the chair of the environment public works committee is a climate deny whole has written books about