Page 50 - Restraining Orders News Today

Approximately 83 days. str connected to or joined to the cheyenne river sioux tribe suit? >> so we have to be cautious and careful. without hearing our side, the administration not knowing really whats going on. we knew exactly what they were doing. the department of armies started drafting 110 page memo in response to our -- anticipating some temporary restraining orders coming forward. they submitted that to the judge and this outlines what theyve done. theyve anticipated our argument. what th...

Circuit where if you have a favorable finding in your favor on the arguments and were going into a divided court that doesnt have a majority 4-4, were it to be 4-4 the lower court opinion of the ninth circuit would hold? . thats exactly right. in fact we saw that same circumstance chris when president obama issued an executive order around immigration that the then texas attorney general filed an action in the district court, federal court in texas that put a stop to the order. the court of appe...

Will see it our way and uphold the stay on the ban. >> if they uphold the stay on the ban and the federal government does seek review which seems almost guaranteed, i cant imagine them walking away at this point. >> i agree. >> were coming out of the ninth circuit where if you have a favorable finding in your favor on the arguments and were going into a divided court that doesnt have a majority 4-4, were it to be 4-4 the lower court opinion of the ninth circuit would hold? thats exactly right. i...

Arguments of the state of washington that its doing it on behalf of corporations harmed, the responses why arent these corporations with plaintiffs in the case? if the court finds there is no standing, that the state of washington, minnesota do not have standing to bring the suit, its over. the executive order is back in force. if the court finds there is standing, they have to go to the next issue. >> bill: part of that issue would be did the judge in the state of washington act within his righ...

The preliminary injunction motion will be fully briefed a week from friday. im confident that judge robart will schedule a hearing and rule quickly after that. i would point out that the 14 day limit is 4x partake temporary restraining orders.

Arguments of the state of washington that its doing it on behalf of corporations harmed, the responses why arent these corporations with plaintiffs in the case? if the court finds there is no standing, that the state of washington, minnesota do not have standing to bring the suit, its over. the executive order is back in force. if the court finds there is standing, they have to go to the next issue. >> bill: part of that issue would be did the judge in the state of washington act within his righ...

Quickly after that. id also point out that the 14-day limit is for ex parte. temporary restraining orders by its text. this one -- >> no, its not. >> part of the problem with -- part of the problem with treating this as a temporary restraining order, your honor, if it the defendants are right that any time the court enters a temp their restraining order after a hearing, and briefing, its treated as a preliminary injunction. thats a terrible rule to create for district courts. because it discoura...

A trial in judge robarts courtroom. >> shepard: prediction. >> i think theyll find theres no standing and theyll vacate the order and theyll have a trial. i think the president will enforce this executive order during the pendency of the trial. having said that, theres 43 lawsuits throughout the country, this is one of them. theres two nationwide retraining orders. this one judge robarts and one here in new york city. the other cases have temporary restraining orders, just in the jurisdiction wh...

Briefing schedule. the preliminary injunction motion will be fully briefed a week from friday. im confident that judge robart will schedule a hearing and rule quickly after that. i would point out that the 14 day limit is 4x partake temporary restraining orders. mo. with every click...call...punch... and paycheck... youve earned your medicare. it was a deal that was made long ago, and aarp believes it should be honored. thankfully, president trump does too. "i am going to protect and save your s...

Consider the very power of the president, and finally, he never seemed to entertain the notion that washingtons stated argument, this is a violation of the first and fifth amendment, sorry, the vast majority of the people affected by president trumps order do not enjoy american constitutional rights because they are not on our soil. >> jon: i know you have a more in-depth piece on this on foxnews.com, and people who want to get your take on it should go there to read it, but in essence, you thin...