Page 3 - Return Directive News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The Court adopted the view that a return decision or removal order does not infringe the right to respect for the private life of a third-country national concerned on the sole ground that, if he or she were returned to the receiving country, that national would be exposed to the risk that his or her state of health deteriorates, where such a risk does not reach the severity threshold required under Article 4 of the Charter. Nonetheless, the Court ruled that the national s state of health and the care received must be considered by the competent national authority, along with other relevant factors (such as social ties, dependency, and health fragility), when determining whether the national s right to respect for private life precludes removal.

Den haagZuid hollandStaatssecretaris van justitieJudgment of the courtEuropean parliamentRights of the european union charterUnited nationsJustice grand chamberFindings of the courtRights of the european unionEuropean unionCouncil directiveGrand chamberFundamental rightsMember statesReturn directive