Damage National Security if released. The departments Court Challenge again expected any moment would be an attempt to reverse cannons restrictions. But theres another aspect of all this to keep in mind. The appeal were talking about would be heard in the 11th u. S. Circuit court of appeals where six of 11 judges happen to be trump appointees. All of this remains up in the air. Another major advancement to tell you about in this story, judge cannon also appointed a Special Master to review those seized document. His name is Raymond Deariement a semi retired u. S. District judge from new york. He was originally suggested by trumps team. He ultimately was approved of by both parties. Dearies deadline is one week after thanksgiving, thats November 30th. Weeks, of course, after the midterm elections and more than a month after the date doj had requested. And when were talking about potential threats to National Security, we all know at this point time is of the essence. Just what makes it
damage national security if released. the department s court challenge again expected any moment would be an attempt to reverse cannon s restrictions. but there s another aspect of all this to keep in mind. the appeal we re talking about would be heard in the 11th u.s. circuit court of appeals where six of 11 judges happen to be trump appointees. all of this remains up in the air. another major advancement to tell you about in this story, judge cannon also appointed a special master to review those seized document. his name is raymond deariement a semi retired u.s. district judge from new york. he was originally suggested by trump s team. he ultimately was approved of by both parties. dearie s deadline is one week after thanksgiving, that s november 30th. weeks, of course, after the midterm elections and more than a month after the date doj had requested. and when we re talking about potential threats to national security, we all know at this point time is of the essence. jus
want a strong presidency. they used a strong presidency. they believe in a strong presidency. and under this theory, it is really the current president who has the power and the power over all of the parts of the executive branch. so the idea that a previous president could come in and do something like exert executive privilege really chips away at that. and you have people on the bench, i m not sure about the 11th circuit, but certainly on the supreme court who would not want to see that chipped away at. they want this theory, they ve been pushing for this theory. the federalist society was founded in part because there was a strong belief in this theory. and now to see judge cannon in her decision sort of weaken it in any way i think is anathema to a lot of folks which is why you re seeing republicans like chris christie, like bill barr, come out and say this ruling shouldn t stand. barbara, you tweeted this the most outrageous statement in the court s order is her rejection of
suggest. he wasn t one of their candidates, but they agreed to him. what can we expect if expectations are still a thing for any of us on this story, from him? sure. i noted fairly well you know, i practiced for many, many years in the eastern district of new york, that s sort of brooklyn, u.s. attorney s office. he was the u.s. attorney there. he also was a judge for many, many, many years. he is universally beloved. it is he is somebody who the defense bar and the prosecutors both want to appear in front of. that s saying a lot. everyone knows that he is compassionate and fair and wise. and i also think one attribute that he has will come in very handy. he is an extremely good read of people and has very good interpersonal skills. and i think for a judge as new as judge cannon, i think having
christie really both speaking to the strength of the government s case and the lack of sense in any of trump s appointee there. aileen cannon s rulings. you trace it back to some deeper in republican politics. tell me about jones day. it was a law firm founded in cleveland in 1893. for many decades it was just a very aggressive corporate litigation. it would defend companies like rjr and purdue pharma, and go to the mat helping them fend off threats to their business. that s like deregulation, that s primarily lawsuits. if a company s making products that are end up harming people, you know, these companies want a robust defense against allegations. yeah, it s also trying to water down regulations, trying to fend off criminal investigations, things like that. but it start good 10 or 15 years ago, the law firm started shifting to the right and started taking on cases during the obama era where it was