Page 129 - Review Process News Today

Theyre trying to explain -- >> im sure hed do it behind my back too. donald trump comes out of the world war ii generation, you know. my dad was a world war ii guy. you know, these guys didnt go to sensitivity class. they just were gruff. they told you what they thought. in the heat of battle, everybody is a pain in the neck. but at the end of the day, you know, theres real values there. he believes in something. and, look, hes accomplishing things. so im not saying everything hes doing -- i thi...

Idiot, how does that go over? >> theyre not going to be fired. im not going to be upset about it. >> come on. >> i was just at john mccains service. you know how many times john mccain would say, hey, what are you doing, jerk? >> to your face is different when youre not there and theyre trying to explain -- >> im sure hed do it behind my back too. donald trump comes out of the world war ii generation, you know. my dad was a world war ii guy. you know, these guys didnt go to sensitivity class. th...

Archives, they swapped the nonpartisan review process used for every nominee since watergate for a partisan one. i think you only have to look at watergate to see why we have that nonpartisan process. his fault by every nomination since watergate until today. my question still recurs, what is being hidden and why? every white house record that weve received was hand picked by your deputy in the bush white house. a hyperconflicted lawyer who also represents a half dozen trump destination official...

Administration. senate minority leader chuck schumer calls the decision a friday night document massacre. democrats claim republicans are trying to force through kavanaughs nomination without the proper scrutiny. lets go to cnn white house correspondent boris sanchez. boris, what is the reason why the white house is withholding by way of executive privilege withholding this 100,000 pages of documents? >> hey there. the trump administration citing constitutional privilege for withholding these 10...

>> sandra: you know, congressman, for the american people we see these closed-door sessions, questioning by house republicans on this issue and americans see you and this is going to happen finally with bruce ohr in this case august 28th. youll sit down and ask him questions. what do you anticipate will actually come of this? will there be a change? he is still employed at the d.o.j. >> he is a federal employee and there is a process that takes -- to remove anyone from that position. we saw that...

Okay with if you left us, i can retaliate. this is literally about what he said in the public sphere. >> to be clear, one of those reasons that would justify somebody taking your clearance away is that if you mishandled. if you came on the show and said things that you are not entitled to say. no accusations that brennan did anything that would justify that. >> i am not aware of any accusations. i myself have gone through so many hoops to try to get my book cleared at this point. making sure i g...

Away is that if you mishandled. if you came on the show and said things that you are not entitled to say. no accusations that brennan did anything that would justify that. >> i am not aware of any accusations. i myself have gone through so many hoops to try to get my book cleared at this point. making sure i go through a review process. i am doing everything i can to uphold my security agreement with the government. the president needs to abide by and respect the same types of rules that the res...

What is looking he-- what is la is the important review process. where the intelligence community and agencies actually take a look at whether or not someone needs their clearance once they leave government work. that would be prudent. cherry picking a political opponent and pulling clearance, that seems petty. >> phil wegmann, thank you for getting up early. >> thanks, ryan. hundreds of newspapers from coast to coast are sending a coordinated message to readers today. the press is not the ene...

After stzok, one even saying he is a dentist and his body language. that being said, what is your take on whether he should have been fired? >> there is the formal review process. at the end of the day, you have to look at this man where he stands today and he cannot effectively do a job for the fbi. he cannot do the job he was hired to do and had a career in. he is always going to be a problem for the fbi and its credibility. theres nowhere else in the fbi he could have worked? >> with 21 years...

President, youre in trouble. >> wa, the, the -- watters did acknowledge the economy improvement but other mess will be the presidents fall. jillian: delayed for the second time if federal review process, the government needs to review the environmental impact on the surrounding jackson park before it can be built, construction now likely to begin next year. >> 20 minutes after the hour now, new report blasting the obama administration for handing over a 200,000-dollar taxpayer funded grant to a ...