Page 57 - Reviewing News Today

A little bit different than the way the investigation of the president has been handled. ainsley: is that double standard. >> we already know we are not looking for evidence out of whole cloth that she had a chinese spy looking for her, driving to her, listening to her conversations, i guess, catching her as shes drivers do in very personal moments when you are talking on the phone or reviewing documents. maybe speaking out loud to a person next to you a staff member, perhaps. we already have th...

An r apparatus is chilling. steve bannon is just a flat-out freak. it is really just a shame to have this sort of politicalization of people that worked to protect the country. i think republicans should speak out more on it. if you are going to have a process of reviewing whether or not x officials should have security clearance, there is an organized methodical way to do it. the way this looks is petty and vindictive, like another feud with rosie odonnell. >> and nbc news is reporting that dan...

Have this sort of politicalization of people that worked to protect the country. i think republicans should speak out more on it. if you are going to have a process of reviewing whether or not x officials should have security clearance, there is an organized methodical way to do it. the way this looks is petty and vindictive, like another feud with rosie odonnell. >> and nbc news is reporting that dan coats was not informed beforehand about this revoking the security clearance, had no idea. the ...

Passes from anybody. that that has normally been done by agency heads or immediate superiors to people. have you considered all these things in the process you say youre going to? >> again, the other individuals -- those are being reviewed. that determination will be made at a later date. those that have already been revoked, it would be for the purpose of reviewing whether or not they should be reinstated or not. >> sarah? >> major. >> just so i understand the standard the president is applying...

Superior people. have you considered all of these things in the process you say you are going to perform? >> again, the other individuals, those are being reviewed. thadetermination will be made at a later date. those that have already been revoked it would be for the purpose of reviewing whether or not they should be reinstated or not. major? >> sarah, i just wanted to understand -- you outlined two areas of either contradictory or erroneous testimony from brennan. is that the only standard by ...

Agency heads or immediate superiors. have you considered all of these things in the process you say you are going to do? >> again, the other individuals, those are being reviewed. that determination will be made at a later date. those that have been revoked, it would be for the purpose of reviewing whether or not they should be reinstated or not. major. >> reporter: you outlined two areas of contradictory or erroneous testimony from brennan. is that the only standard by which this administration...

Your question, the president didnt want to speak about it on camera. didnt so on twitter and his associates are saying please call the outside lawyers. alex. >> hey, kelly, can i ask you about the photo from politico playbook yesterday. can you describe what were seeing here? by the way congressman heck is sitting on the set and laughing as well. bob mueller, donald junior, i put it out on social media with the caption, awkward. you can tell us what is happening here? >> well, its really an extr...

Indicates that they abused the fisa system in any way. >> there were several pages redacted of this 400-plus page application, glenn. so how can you be sure this was done by the book, as you put it? >> well, ana, i think we can be sure it was done by the book, with notwithstanding the redactions, because four separate judges over time had an opportunity to review the materials and to weigh in and each and every one determined that there was reason, there was probable cause to issue this surveill...

Said he is not the sole investigator to open the of trump russia investigation. i think as the public learns more about what we saw in the house intelligence committee and more evidence that bob mueller is reviewing, they will have a lot of confidence in the work that the fbi did to start this investigation and hopefully close it soon. >> right. and you did say something else. right in the beginning, when things got totally out of control and we didnt have enough cameras to cover all 72 of you, ...

He was not the sole investigator to close the hillary clinton case, he was not the sole investigator to open the investigation. i think as the public learns about more of the evidence we saw and more evidence that bob mueller is reviewing, theyll have more confidence in what the fbi did to start this investigation. >> brian: you were prepared and you did bring up those things in your introduction. you did say something else. when things got totally out of control and we didnt have enough cameras...