i think we need to get, we need to have a 15-year anniversary risk game, starring admiral james stavridis. i think that would be fun. mj15 risk. admiral four star james stavridis. i m sure that s what he thinks he needs to do with his time. we ll do it for charity. and former chief of cia, marc pollymeopoulos. thank you. former watchdog abandoned plans to try to recover deleted secret service messages. joining us now. reporter for the washington post. she and her colleague, broke the latest development in the growing development in the controversy. it is just hard to believe they
a mini revolution. sometimes they play so far in time that the phone is 235 systems when they are into a session creating an enormous number of triangles in the center of which in turn facilitates his extreme cheeky technique. it s no coincidence did you all invested 140000000 euros the new full backs up to not winning a title in this 1st in city seasons but that still wasn t enough for him this summer he bought drought can seal the most expensive right bank in the works. so other players perhaps the key to further fundamental development and football techniques in any case the trend in transfers is towards expensive defenders because they are essential for implementing technical refinements. during clubs high risk game has only work perfectly since virgil found i came along to safeguard against the risk. real madrid hadn t won the champions league in years until they
special prosecutor of an impeccable integrity who went about this in as nonpartisan, as methodical of a way as you can do it and then has this odd place where he s decided to stop and not go any further. and what i worry about and it s really more from a political point of view is that he will stop tomorrow and he will not go any further. he will simply either repeat or read from that report and donald trump with his huge megaphone will stand up and say, you see, i said no collusion or obstruction and mueller agreed with me yesterday even though he didn t and we ll be in that situation. so i think the democrats are playing a slightly high risk game here as to whether this actually helps them or hurts them in trying to make it clear that donald trump broke a lot of laws. the questions are going to be really important. we want to reporting now from nbc news, two weeks ago nbc s julia ainsley and jacob
this is like the first time that the u.s. presidents had done this. worried about what they would do. getting them off at their game is a precondition. but it can also lead to some pretty horrible outcomes. it will be dependent on trumpet and indeed on his national security team. with the better directions. i think that he can do it but nonetheless this is a high risk game. it has to be. it has taken them a long time. and some pretty bad u.s. policy. he s in a bad position. he is doing pretty well on this. just to put pressure on china. one way of doing that. when they met with them in florida was to go ahead and launch that attack in syria for the asad regime using gas against his own people.
this is kind of a high risk game, i believe, for boehner right now. is there any deal that wouldn t explode the tea party? well, yeah. what would be the deal? the deal that wouldn t explode it is if you cut a lot of spending and you don t all of a sudden raise taxes to a higher tax rate. i think they would be fine getting rid of some of the loopholes, but if this goes to where it s just higher tax rates on the rich and very little spending cuts, they little reform, i think there will be huge outrage. how about a sizable adjustment in entitlements, a big billions of dollars in cuts in regular spending, appropriations spending, and a reduction in the rich person s tax rate, a rise to 37% or 38%, would that sell with the right or not? i think there s a chance if they would see real reform, real cuts, more than what the president was saying, 2.5 times of cuts for every tax increase, but what they don t want are tax increases now and future cuts. that s not going to work. ok