or this is a 2nd world war. you have united states and the soviet union, then after the end of so union americans thought they re going to have a uni polar role with united the 6 leaving that when this was about people like francis fukuyama talk to but in the history do the debate among the scholars, there s what americans wanted to do was actually achieve. there are some people who believe that americans never could establish really pull out all the people who believed they did it for maybe 15 or 18 years from the fall of the soviet union. and 2007 or 2008. and so there s a debate on that. but what we know now is that the world is moving toward the most high polar system. and during this transition, you re going to see more difficulties. so you d like to see countries trying to find ways of. busy improving the chances of actually being a greater power when the new world order is that should be settled down now. but as i, as, as we move away from the western centers system or
bipolar world or this is 2nd world war. you have united states and the soviet union, and then after the end of so union americans thought they re going to have a uni polar role with united the 6 leaving that when the super about people like francis fukuyama talk to but in the history do the debate among scholars there s what americans wanted to do was actually achieve. there are some people who believe that americans never could establish. ringback really pull out some people who believed they did it for maybe 15 or 18 years from the fall of the soviet union and 2007 or 2008. and so there s a debate on that. but what you know now is that the world is moving towards the most high polar system. and during this transition, you re going to see more difficulties. so you d like to see countries trying to find ways of improving the chances of actually being a greater power when the new world order is actually settled down now. but as i, as, as we move away from the western centers s
ukraine take it? and what does it mean for the rest of the world? to discuss that i m now joined by what is id, professor of political communications at the university of tech run, present his id is great to talk to you. thank you very much for your time. thank you for hiring. now, in one of your recent articles, you suggested that they send you political rivalry over your grade that we all are now observing in some or even participating in just like the problem of iran. suppose that malicious nuclear intention is essentially an artificial problem. it was deliberately created by the americans to justify their intentional geopolitical you cannot make, has to teach always those countries. does washington even need a pre tax to do what it said? it s mind i m doing, you know, when it comes to russia, i think they do because it s not very easy to question russia when it comes to you . they can always tend to take on the case to the. ready un security council with russia having a v
without solve on the problems. and then ukraine would not have been able to be used as a stage to attack russia. it will cost difficult, but the problem with that rationale is that the war in your brain is putting pressure not only on russia, but pretty much from the rest of the world. because we see that in the form of skyrocketing within the field prices in many, many countries that have nothing to do with russia or ukraine are filling the pinch . now you ve been pretty open about your use that you believe that these conflicting ukraine is changing their current world order, and that is pushing it towards a more multi polar arrangement with different powers are going to compete with each other. do you think that new arrangements, whatever is going to be if you think going to be more or less violent than what we have at the moment? you know we are going to transition. we had the bipolar world or this is what you have united states and the soviet union. then after the end of
Just diminished with the end of the cold war. How far can the current conflict over ukraine take it, and what does it mean for the rest of the world . To discuss it, im now joined by what is i the professor of Political Communications at the university of tech, ron professor. His id is great to talk to you. Thank you very much for your time. Thank you for having me. Now, in one of your recent articles, you suggested that they said you political rivalry over your credit, the all, and now im serving in summer, even participating in just like the problem of iran. Suppose that malicious nuclear intention is essentially an artificial problem if it was deliberately created by the american to justify our intentional jewel political you cannot make, has suicide towards those countries. Does washington even need a pretext to do . What is sad is mind them doing . You know, when it comes to russia, i think they do because its not that easy to question russia when it comes to you know, they can al