includes his future recordings. japan s naomi osaka pulls out of wimbledon a month after withdrawing from the french open. hello and thanks forjoining us. the us supreme court has ruled against the latest republican challenge to the affordable care act known as obamaca re. it s survived the third attempt to strike it down, which was led by eighteen republican controlled states. president biden described the decision as a big win for the american people. barack obama said it showed that his signature policy was here to stay . it s the third time the court has thrown out efforts to scrap the programme. well, to discuss can now speak to us supreme court and us constitution expert ilya shapiro who is the director of the robert a levy center for constitutional studies at the cato institute.
The result of the case could have far-reaching ramifications for tens of millions of public school students.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday will hear a case on schoolspeech that could be the most influential on the topic since the famous 1969 case Tinker v. Des Moines.
The dispute stems from Snapchat posts by a high school sophomore after she did not make a varsity cheer team. But it could have implications for tens of millions of students nationwide, and to what extent schools are allowed to regulate and punish students for speech that happens outside of school.
It pits the school district against Christian groups; the Biden administration against the ACLU; and anti-bullying advocates against student rights groups.
(AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
WASHINGTON (CN) Citing California’s history of failing to keep personal information secure, the U.S. Supreme Court appeared likely Monday morning to overturn the state’s nonprofit donor disclosure law.
“If someone said ‘I want to give a donation [to a controversial group] but I want to be sure California won’t disclose it, can you guarantee the donation won’t be made public?” Chief Justice John Roberts asked California’s Deputy Solicitor General Aimee Feinberg during a hearing that lasted over two hours.
“I don’t think any organization can guarantee perfection,” Feinberg responded.
Deseret News
Public confidence in institutions is already low. Adding justices to the Supreme Court would make it worse
Share this story
Photo Illustration by Michelle Budge and Alex Cochran
The debate over enlarging the U.S. Supreme Court would be largely unnecessary if Congress would take its power to legislate seriously.
Even so, history has plenty to offer on the subject, clearly demonstrating that court size has been used as a political weapon before. No one should doubt that, once unsheathed again after lying dormant for 152 years, it would be weaponized again.
The nation’s high court has, in recent decades, become pivotal in battles over culture-war issues. That includes cases involving limits on abortion rights, such as a recent one striking down a Louisiana state law that imposed hospital-admission requirements on abortion clinic doctors. And in the Hobby Lobby case that exempted private corporations from regulations its owners objected to on religious grounds. And i