Nominal Index [Citation 301 – 619]Bina Saxena w/o Late Ravendra Kumar Saxena v. Union of India 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 301Hemant Dhirajlal Banker v. State of Maharashtra 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 302CIT v. M/s.
Nominal Index [Citation 519 - 552]Matrix Publicities and Media India Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle- 16(1), Mumbai & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 509Bapu Bajarang Patil v. State of.
Observing that lawyers at the bar were required to be sensitive to the heavy load of matters heard by Family Court Judges daily, the Bombay High Court dismissed a woman’s plea seeking directions to.
Justice Deshmukh noted that the petitioner failed to produce any statistical data to demonstrate that unreasonable adjournments were granted by the family court.