Rti Application News Today

Swamy had filed the RTI application in November 2022 and sought the details regarding Chinese incursions into Indian territory from the Ministry of External Affairs, Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of Defence.

Overall, since 2018, when the scheme was launched, the Government printed EBs worth Rs 35,660 crore — 33,000 bonds of Rs one crore face value each and 26,600 bonds of Rs 10 lakh face value each.

The government in various states will be required to spend a huge sum of exchequer money for the foodgrain sacks having PM Modi’s photo that will be distributed through the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana (PMGKAY).

In the 30th phase, 540 bonds with a face value of Rs 1 crore were issued to anonymous donors who are believed to be businessmen and corporates. In fact, over 94 per cent of the bonds were of Rs 1 crore face value in most of the 30 phases.

New Delhi, Jan 30 (PTI) Alleging more than nine lakh posts are lying vacant in various departments of the central government, Indian Youth Congress national president Srinivas BV on Tuesday said that no steps have been taken by the ruling dispensation to fill those posts.

The Central Information Commission has directed the Defence Ministry to revisit its decision to withhold records pertaining to the Agnipath military recruitment scheme under the Right to Information...

The Central Information Commission has directed the defence ministry to revisit its refusal to disclose records related to the Agnipath military recruitment scheme under the Right to Information Act. Activist Vihar Durve had filed an RTI application seeking records of deliberations on the Agnipath scheme. The defence ministry classified the files as "secret" and invoked Section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act to deny the information.

India News: A person cannot be deprived of the right to live with dignity merely because that person is convicted, said Calcutta high court in a case where a woma

Section 24 of the RTI Act exempts certain intelligence and security organisations from disclosing information under the RTI Act, except in respect of allegations of human rights violations.

The Public Information Officer of the High Court reasoned that the disclosure of this information was not in the larger public interest and could endanger the life or physical safety of judges and officials of the Court.