Page 15 - Rule Making News Today

Settlement, it said it was pending, assuming the government would issue regulations that would sort of codify the spirit of the settlement into formal rule making. that never happened. within the administration in the past 20 years. this administration is doing it. what they are hoping is they can nullify the settlement and set th their own rules. >> sorry to jump in, but havent they tried that? didnt they try that two months ago and got rejected? >> thats a very good point. this is going to be ...

Text structure, history, as reflected in the footnote nine, then it is impermissible, but otherwise, if there is a gap in the interpretations under the chevron doctrine, it is upheld. >> then when you talked about interpreting the statute, agency rule making. >> ordinarily it will be in agency rule making, or at least often. >> and there is an exception, correct? four major cases? what is the exception? for the rules of major economic or social significance, the supreme court has long made clear...

Delegated too much of its responsibility to the executive branch by giving them this deference and rule making. and the broader and more vague at the congressional delegations are, the greater the opportunity for the executive to simply write a law through rule makings. so it is a very significant issue. a further question i have is -- and i know you have also been asked this earlier. is there a point at which congressional delegation can be so broad as to be unconstitutional? for example, one o...

Things happening through rule making, that is reversing the obama administrations policy when it comes to emissions on cars in a major way and also allowing the sale of health insurance plans that undermine the rules of obamacare and these are things that are happening on their own but not getting the attention. >> well, yeah, and i think trump administration actions are going to escalate as congress calls it quit bes sides trying to fund the government this fall so theres a distance between rud...

Republicans. sorry. go ahead. >> i wanted you to respond if you could for the cafe standards rule imposed today. 20 state attorneys general that put a civil suit. the administration, part of their complaint. they say weakening the standards but the health of the children, the communities at risk and it increases rising cost of the climated change fur our state. the administration response is what? >> that the reporting that we were reversing the obama era fuel efficiency standard and preemptivin...

Proposal, is freezing the increases. by 2025, the obama straight wanted the cap a standards to be at roughly 54 miles per gallon. well, the trump administration is saying we need to freeze at the level well be at come 2021 because one, its going to cost too much for people to buy the cars that will perhaps meet these standards. theyre also making an argument that perhaps these standards would make vehicles or driving even more dangerous. whichever you believe, theres states which are lining up l...

Traffic administration, which released the official notice, said the proposal would prevent more than 12,700 on-road fatalities and significantly more injuries. hmm. earlier press secretary sarah huckabee sanders tamped down on the seriousness of this announcement clarifying that this is just a notice of proposed rule making. >> what the epa released yesterday was a notice of proposed rule making, not a final rule. the notice lays out a series of options for how to go forward with cafe standards...

Its still going through the bureaucratic review process. this is what a spokesperson told me in part today. the assessments of this type are often the result of needs for particular rule making and the undergoing extensive interagency and interagency processes. the e.p.a. also stated that theyre not attempt to delay any questions about the studies, but there are members of congress concerned about this delay. in fact, brook, back at a hearing in january democratic senators pressed the then -- an...

For court to go further in the opposite direction as long as the commission appli neutrally ily across the board, bias towards baker or photographer, then they can punish him for expressing or practicing his religious beliefs. paul: is that why you think bryer and kagan went along, it would allow us to do that down the road. >> some questions, maybe, they are trying to be consistent where they came out on the travel ban where they are taking the position that trumps statements were made bias the...

For court to go further in the opposite direction as long as the commission applies neutrally ily across the board, bias towards baker or photographer, then they can punish him for expressing or practicing his religious beliefs. paul: is that why you think bryer and kagan went along, it would allow us to do that down the road. >> some questions, maybe, they are trying to be consistent where they came out on the travel ban where they are taking the position that trumps statements were made bias t...